A Systematic Literature Review of Reviews on the Effectiveness of Chlamydia Testing

Author:

Wong William Chi Wai12,Lau Stephanie Tsz Hei1,Choi Edmond Pui Hang3,Tucker Joseph D45,Fairley Christopher K67,Saunders John M8

Affiliation:

1. Department of Family Medicine and Primary Care, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China

2. Department of General Practice, The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China

3. School of Nursing, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, People’s Republic of China

4. Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC

5. Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, The London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom

6. Melbourne Sexual Health Centre, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

7. Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

8. University College London Centre for Clinical Research in Infection and Sexual Health, Institute for Global Health, London, United Kingdom

Abstract

Abstract Chlamydia trachomatis is the most common bacterial sexually transmitted infection, causing significant morbidity and economic burden. Strategies like national screening programs or home-testing kits were introduced in some developed countries, yet their effectiveness remains controversial. In this systematic review, we examined reviews of chlamydia screening interventions to assess their effectiveness and the elements that contribute to their success to guide public policy and future research. We assessed English material published after 2000 in PubMed, the Cochrane Library, the British Nursing Index, Medical Database, and Sociological Abstracts, in addition to World Health Organization Global Health Sector Strategies, the European Center for Disease Prevention and Control guidelines, and the Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews. Systematic reviews that focused on chlamydia screening interventions were included. Using the socioecological model, we examined the levels of interventions that may affect the uptake of chlamydia screening. A total of 19 systematic reviews were included. Self-collection in home-testing kits significantly increased screening among girls and women 14–50 years of age. At the organizational level, using electronic health records and not creating additional costs facilitated testing. At the community level, outreach interventions in community and parent centers and homeless shelters achieved high screening rates. At the policy level, interventions with educational and advisory elements could result in significant improvements in screening rates.

Funder

Seed Fund for Basic Research

University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, People’s Republic of China

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

General Medicine,Epidemiology

Cited by 9 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Addressing Challenges in Chlamydia trachomatis Detection: A Comparative Review of Diagnostic Methods;Medicina;2024-07-30

2. Evidence of the Role of Pharmacy-Based Interventions in Sexually Transmitted Infections;Encyclopedia of Evidence in Pharmaceutical Public Health and Health Services Research in Pharmacy;2023

3. Gaps in Sexual and Reproductive Health in Young People;Gaps and Actions in Health Improvement from Hong Kong and Beyond;2023

4. Evidence of the Role of Pharmacy-Based Interventions in Sexually Transmitted Infections;Encyclopedia of Evidence in Pharmaceutical Public Health and Health Services Research in Pharmacy;2022

5. Intensified partner notification and repeat testing can improve the effectiveness of screening in reducing Chlamydia trachomatis prevalence: a mathematical modelling study;Sexually Transmitted Infections;2021-11-23

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3