Addressing Challenges in Chlamydia trachomatis Detection: A Comparative Review of Diagnostic Methods
Author:
Rodrigues Rafaela123ORCID, Silva Ana Rita3, Sousa Carlos3ORCID, Vale Nuno124ORCID
Affiliation:
1. PerMed Research Group, Center for Health Technology and Services Research (CINTESIS), Rua Doutor Plácido da Costa, 4200-450 Porto, Portugal 2. CINTESIS@RISE, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Alameda Professor Hernâni Monteiro, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal 3. Molecular Diagnostics Laboratory, Unilabs Portugal, Centro Empresarial Lionesa Porto, Rua Lionesa, 4465-671 Leça do Balio, Portugal 4. Department of Community Medicine, Health Information and Decision (MEDCIDS), Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Rua Doutor Plácido da Costa, 4200-450 Porto, Portugal
Abstract
Chlamydial infections are one of the most common sexually transmitted bacterial infections worldwide, which is related to serious consequences for the mental, sexual, and reproductive health of women and men. The infection is commonly asymptomatic; consequently, screening programs for infection control have been introduced in some countries. The detection methods of Chlamydia trachomatis infections have evolved since the establishment of the first gold-standard detection method in the 1970s, the culture assay. Over the decades, many efforts were made to find methods with a higher sensitivity, until the 1990s, when, as a result of advances in molecular biology, nucleic acid amplification tests came into use with more sensitivity, and, currently, there are several available with which to detect infection. Therefore, herein, we will review the main methods used for CT detection and the differences between them, in terms of targets, infections that can be detected, sensitivity, and specificity. We will focus on some of the FDA-approved CT detection tests and highlight the major advantages and superiority of using molecular biology techniques. In addition, we will examine the larger challenges and limitations of the methods currently in use and discuss how they might be surpassed. Moreover, in this review, we will describe the next step to carry out after testing positive for CT infection.
Funder
FEDER—Fundo Europeu de Desenvolimento Regional FCT CHAIR in Onco-Innovation at FMUP
Reference92 articles.
1. Chlamydia trachomatis infections: Screening, diagnosis, and management;Mishori;Am. Fam. Physician,2012 2. Chlamydial eye infections: Current perspectives;Satpathy;Indian J. Ophthalmol.,2017 3. Mohseni, M., Sung, S., and Takov, V. (2024, July 01). Chlamydia, Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK537286/. 4. Gallenga, C.E., Maritati, M., Del Boccio, M., D’Aloisio, R., Conti, P., Mura, M., Contini, C., and Gallenga, P.E. (2023). Why the SAFE—S Strategy for Trachoma? Are Musca sorbens or Scatophaga stercoraria Really the Culprit?—A Brief Historical Review from an Italian Point of View. Pathogens, 12. 5. Rodrigues, R., Vieira-Baptista, P., Catalão, C., Borrego, M.J., Sousa, C., and Vale, N. (2023). Chlamydial and Gonococcal Genital Infections: A Narrative Review. J. Pers. Med., 13.
|
|