An evaluation of daily precipitation from a regional atmospheric reanalysis over Australia
-
Published:2019-08-19
Issue:8
Volume:23
Page:3387-3403
-
ISSN:1607-7938
-
Container-title:Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci.
Author:
Acharya Suwash ChandraORCID, Nathan RoryORCID, Wang Quan J., Su Chun-Hsu, Eizenberg Nathan
Abstract
Abstract. An accurate representation of spatio-temporal characteristics of
precipitation fields is fundamental for many hydro-meteorological analyses
but is often limited by the paucity of gauges. Reanalysis models provide
systematic methods of representing atmospheric processes to produce datasets
of spatio-temporal precipitation estimates. The precipitation from the
reanalysis datasets should, however, be evaluated thoroughly before use
because it is inferred from physical parameterization. In this paper, we
evaluated the precipitation dataset from the Bureau of Meteorology
Atmospheric high-resolution Regional Reanalysis for Australia (BARRA) and
compared it against (a) gauged point observations, (b) an interpolated
gridded dataset based on gauged point observations (AWAP – Australian Water Availability Project), and (c) a global
reanalysis dataset (ERA-Interim). We utilized a range of evaluation metrics
such as continuous metrics (correlation, bias, variability, and modified
Kling–Gupta efficiency), categorical metrics, and other statistics (wet-day
frequency, transition probabilities, and quantiles) to ascertain the quality
of the dataset. BARRA, in comparison with ERA-Interim, shows a better
representation of rainfall of larger magnitude at both the point and grid scale
of 5 km. BARRA also more closely reproduces the distribution of wet days and
transition probabilities. The performance of BARRA varies spatially, with
better performance in the temperate zone than in the arid and tropical
zones. A point-to-grid evaluation based on correlation, bias, and modified
Kling–Gupta efficiency (KGE′) indicates that ERA-Interim performs on par or
better than BARRA. However, on a spatial scale, BARRA outperforms
ERA-Interim in terms of the KGE′ score and the components of the KGE′ score. Our
evaluation illustrates that BARRA, with richer spatial variations in
climatology of daily precipitation, provides an improved representation of
precipitation compared with the coarser ERA-Interim. It is a useful
complement to existing precipitation datasets for Australia, especially in
sparsely gauged regions.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Engineering,General Environmental Science
Reference40 articles.
1. Accadia, C., Mariani, S., Casaioli, M., Lavagnini, A., and Speranza, A.:
Sensitivity of Precipitation Forecast Skill Scores to Bilinear Interpolation
and a Simple Nearest-Neighbor Average Method on High-Resolution Verification
Grids, Weather Forecast., 18, 918–932,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0434(2003)018<0918:SOPFSS>2.0.CO;2,
2003. 2. Baez-Villanueva, O. M., Zambrano-Bigiarini, M., Ribbe, L., Nauditt, A.,
Giraldo-Osorio, J. D., and Thinh, N. X.: Temporal and spatial evaluation of
satellite rainfall estimates over different regions in Latin-America, Atmos.
Res., 213, 34–50, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ATMOSRES.2018.05.011, 2018. 3. Beck, H. E., Vergopolan, N., Pan, M., Levizzani, V., van Dijk, A. I. J. M., Weedon, G. P., Brocca, L., Pappenberger, F., Huffman, G. J., and Wood, E. F.: Global-scale evaluation of 22 precipitation datasets using gauge observations and hydrological modeling, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 6201–6217, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-6201-2017, 2017. 4. Beck, H. E., Pan, M., Roy, T., Weedon, G. P., Pappenberger, F., van Dijk, A. I. J. M., Huffman, G. J., Adler, R. F., and Wood, E. F.: Daily evaluation of 26 precipitation datasets using Stage-IV gauge-radar data for the CONUS, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 207–224, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-207-2019, 2019. 5. Bollmeyer, C., Keller, J. D., Ohlwein, C., Wahl, S., Crewell, S.,
Friederichs, P., Hense, A., Keune, J., Kneifel, S., Pscheidt, I., Redl, S., and Steinke, S.: Towards a high-resolution regional reanalysis for the
european CORDEX domain, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 141, 1–15,
https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2486, 2015.
Cited by
32 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|