Older (65+) patients’ use of e-mail consultations: A Danish qualitative study using a Foucauldian framework

Author:

Bavngaard Martin V.1ORCID,Grønning Anette1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. 0000000107280170University of Southern Denmark

Abstract

In Denmark, e-mail consultations (e-cons) are now supplementing conventional consultations with doctors and raising questions related to self-governing technology from the patient perspective. Interestingly, old patients are the most frequent users of this kind of consultation. This article examines how e-cons affect old people’s relationships with and perceptions of their general practitioners (GPs) regarding trust, self-governance and indirect/direct power. This qualitative study is based on interviews with twenty patients between 66 and 83 years old. Applying a thematic analysis in which four salient themes were identified, the study demonstrates that the patients perceive the GP as powerful, knowledgeable and busy; this corresponds with the power relationship between disciplinary institutions and individuals. At the same time, many patients use e-cons as a technology of self-governance, thereby taking responsibility for their own health while still being able to contact the clinic. In this way, patients achieve the potential for self-management, while clinics maintain their institutional power.

Funder

VELUX FOUNDATIONS

Publisher

Intellect

Subject

Communication,Cultural Studies

Reference40 articles.

1. Patients who use e-mediated communication with their doctor: New constructions of trust in the patient-doctor relationship;Qualitative Health Research,2006

2. Danske Regioner: Hver tredje kontakt med lægen skal være digital;Sundhedspolitisk tidsskrift,2018

3. Not just an information-delivery tool: An ethnographic study exploring Danish GPs’ perspectives on and experiences with the relational potential of email consultation;Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care,2020

4. Email consultations between patients and doctors in primary care: Content analysis;Journal of Medical Internet Research,2020

5. Using thematic analysis in psychology;Qualitative Research in Psychology,2006

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3