Current Patterns of Probiotic Use in U.S. Neonatal Intensive Care Units: A Multi-Institution Survey

Author:

Hanna Morcos1ORCID,Ahmad Irfan2,Yanowitz Toby3,Kim Jae4,Hunter Catherine5,DiGeronimo Robert6,Ahmad Kaashif A.7,Sullivan Kevin89,Markel Troy A.10,Hair Amy B.1,Chaaban Hala11,Pammi Mohan1ORCID,Huff Katie A.12,Jasani Bonny13,Fuchs Lynn89,Cuna Alain14,Garg Parvesh M.15,Reber Kristina1,Premkumar Muralidhar H.1,

Affiliation:

1. Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas

2. Division of Neonatology, Children's Hospitals Orange County, Orange, California

3. Division of Neonatology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

4. Division of Neonatology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio

5. Department of Surgery, Division of Pediatric Surgery, Oklahoma Children's Hospital, The University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma

6. Division of Neonatology, University of Washington School of Medicine and Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington

7. Department of Pediatrics, Pediatrix and Obstetrix Specialists of Houston, Houston, Texas

8. Department of Pediatrics, Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

9. Division of Neonatology, Nemours/AI duPont Hospital for Children, Wilmington, Delaware

10. Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana

11. Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma

12. Division of Neonatology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana

13. Division of Neonatology, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada

14. Division of Neonatology, Children's Mercy Kansas City, Kansas City, Missouri

15. Division of Neonatology, Wake Forest University, Winston Salem, North Carolina

Abstract

Objective Probiotic supplementation is associated with health benefits in preterm infants. The 2021 American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) statement on probiotic use advised caution, citing heterogeneity and absence of federal regulation. We assessed the impact of the AAP statement and current institution-wide patterns of probiotic use across neonatal intensive care units (NICU) across the United States. Study Design A cross-sectional web-based institutional survey using REDCap was emailed to 430 Children's Hospital Neonatal Consortium (CHNC) and Pediatrix Medical Group institutions. The survey captured data on probiotic formulations, supplementation, initiation and cessation criteria, reasons for discontinuation, interest in initiating, and AAP statement's impact. Results Ninety-five (22.1%) hospitals, including 42/46 (91%) CHNC and 53/384 (14%) Pediatrix institutions, completed the survey. Thirty-seven (39%) currently use probiotics. Fourteen different probiotic formulations were reported. The common criteria for initiation were birth weight <1,500 g and gestational age <32 weeks. Parental consent or assent was obtained at only 30% of institutions. Five hospitals (11%) with prior probiotic use discontinued solely due to the AAP statement. Overall, 23 (24%) of hospitals indicated that the AAP statement significantly influenced their decision regarding probiotic use. Nineteen of 51 nonusers (37%) are considering initiation. Conclusion Probiotic use in preterm infants is likely increasing in NICUs across the United States, but significant variability exists. The 2021 AAP statement had variable impact on NICUs' decision regarding probiotic use. The growing interest in adopting probiotics and the significant interhospital variability highlight the need for better regulation and consensus guidelines to ensure standardized use. Key Points

Publisher

Georg Thieme Verlag KG

Subject

Obstetrics and Gynecology,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3