Evaluation of Standard Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology, Modified Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology, and Immunotherapy Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology in Newly Diagnosed and Recurrent Glioblastoma

Author:

Youssef Gilbert1ORCID,Rahman Rifaquat2ORCID,Bay Camden3,Wang Wei456,Lim-Fat Mary Jane7,Arnaout Omar8,Bi Wenya Linda8ORCID,Cagney Daniel N.9,Chang Yuh-Shin1011ORCID,Cloughesy Timothy F.1213ORCID,DeSalvo Matthew3ORCID,Ellingson Benjamin M.14151617ORCID,Flood Thomas F.3,Gerstner Elizabeth R.18,Gonzalez Castro L. Nicolas14ORCID,Guenette Jeffrey P.3ORCID,Kim Albert E.18ORCID,Lee Eudocia Q.1ORCID,McFaline-Figueroa Jose R.1,Potter Christopher A.3ORCID,Reardon David A.1ORCID,Huang Raymond Y.3ORCID,Wen Patrick Y.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA

2. Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Boston, MA

3. Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA

4. Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA

5. Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA

6. Division of Sleep Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA

7. Department of Medicine, Division of Neurology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada

8. Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA

9. Radiotherapy Department, Mater Private Network, Dublin, Ireland

10. Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA

11. Department of Radiology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA

12. UCLA Neuro-Oncology Program, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA

13. Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA

14. UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory, Center for Computer Vision and Imaging Biomarkers, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA

15. Department of Radiological Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA

16. Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA

17. Department of Neurosurgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA

18. Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA

Abstract

PURPOSE The Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) criteria are widely used in high-grade glioma clinical trials. We compared the RANO criteria with updated modifications (modified RANO [mRANO] and immunotherapy RANO [iRANO] criteria) in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma (nGBM) and recurrent GBM (rGBM) to evaluate the performance of each set of criteria and inform the development of the planned RANO 2.0 update. MATERIALS AND METHODS Evaluation of tumor measurements and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) sequences were performed by blinded readers to determine disease progression using RANO, mRANO, iRANO, and other response assessment criteria. Spearman's correlations between progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated. RESULTS Five hundred twenty-six nGBM and 580 rGBM cases were included. Spearman's correlations were similar between RANO and mRANO (0.69 [95% CI, 0.62 to 0.75] v 0.67 [95% CI, 0.60 to 0.73]) in nGBM and rGBM (0.48 [95% CI, 0.40 to 0.55] v 0.50 [95% CI, 0.42 to 0.57]). In nGBM, requirement of a confirmation scan within 12 weeks of completion of radiotherapy to determine progression was associated with improved correlations. Use of the postradiation magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as baseline scan was associated with improved correlation compared with use of the pre-radiation MRI (0.67 [95% CI, 0.60 to 0.73] v 0.53 [95% CI, 0.42 to 0.62]). Evaluation of FLAIR sequences did not improve the correlation. Among patients who received immunotherapy, Spearman's correlations were similar among RANO, mRANO, and iRANO. CONCLUSION RANO and mRANO demonstrated similar correlations between PFS and OS. Confirmation scans were only beneficial in nGBM within 12 weeks of completion of radiotherapy, and there was a trend in favor of the use of postradiation MRI as the baseline scan in nGBM. Evaluation of FLAIR can be omitted. The iRANO criteria did not add significant benefit in patients who received immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Publisher

American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

Cited by 12 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3