Author:
Tentor Fabio,Grønholt Schrøder Brit,Nielsen Simon,Schertiger Lars,Stærk Kristian,Emil Andersen Thomas,Bagi Per,Feldskov Nielsen Lene
Abstract
AbstractIntermittent catheterization is the gold standard method for bladder management in individuals with urinary retention and/or incontinence. It is therefore important to understand the performance of urinary catheters, especially on parameters associated to risks of developing urinary tract infections, and that may impact the quality of life for urinary catheter users. Examples of such parameters include, urine flowrate, occurrence of flow-stops, and residual urine left in the bladder after flow-stop. Reliable in-vitro and/or ex-vivo laboratory models represent a strong asset to assess the performance of urinary catheters, preceding and guiding in-vivo animal studies and/or human clinical studies. Existing laboratory models are generally simplified, covering only portions of the catheterization process, or poorly reflect clinical procedures. In this work, we developed an ex-vivo porcine lower urinary tract model that better reflects the catheterization procedure in humans and allows to investigate the performance of standard of care catheters. The performance of three standard of care catheters was investigated in the developed model showing significant differences in terms of flowrate. No differences were detected in terms of residual volume in the bladder at first flow-stop also when tuning the abdominal pressure to mimic a sitting down and standing up position. A newly discovered phenomenon named hammering was detected and measured. Lastly, mucosal suction was observed and measured in all standard of care catheters, raising the concern for microtrauma during catheterization and a need for new and improved urinary catheter designs. Results obtained with the ex-vivo model were compared to in-vivo studies, highlighting similar concerns.
Funder
Ph.D. scholarship from the region of Southern Denmark
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference28 articles.
1. Boyle, P. et al. The prevalence of lower urinary tract symptoms in men and women in four centres. The UrEpik study. BJU Int. 92, 409–414 (2003).
2. Moussa, M., Papatsoris, A., Chakra, M. A., Fares, Y. & Dellis, A. Lower urinary tract dysfunction in common neurological diseases. Turkish J. Urol. 46, S70–S78 (2020).
3. Welch, G., Weinger, K. & Barry, M. J. Quality-of-life impact of lower urinary tract symptom severity: Results from the health professionals follow-up study. Urology 59, 245–250 (2002).
4. Serlin, D. C., Heidelbaugh, J. J. & Stoffel, J. T. Urinary retention in adults: Evaluation and initial management. Am. Fam. Physician 98, 496–503 (2018).
5. Ontario, H. Q. Intermittent catheters for chronic urinary retention: A health technology assessment. Ont. Health Technol. Assess. Ser. 19, 1–153 (2019).
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献