Improved emptying performance with a new micro‐hole zone catheter in adult male intermittent catheter users: A comparative multi‐center randomized controlled cross‐over study

Author:

Thiruchelvam Nikesh1,Landauro Malene Hornbak2ORCID,Biardeau Xavier3,Rovsing Cecilie4,Hahn Markus5,Nascimento Omar Feix do2,Gardner Sharryn6,Amarenco Gérard7,Bagi Per8

Affiliation:

1. Department of Urology, NHS Foundation Trust, Addenbrooke's Hospital Cambridge University Hospital Cambridge UK

2. Coloplast A/S Humlebæk Denmark

3. Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille Lille Cedex France

4. Sanos Clinic Gandrup Denmark

5. ARTIMED Medical Consulting GmbH Kassel Germany

6. Hazelwood House Macclesfield UK

7. Department of Neuro‐Urology Tenon Hospital Paris France

8. Department of Urology Rigshospitalet København Ø Denmark

Abstract

AbstractAimsTo confirm the improved performance of the micro‐hole zone catheter (MHZC) compared to a conventional eyelet catheter (CEC) in male users of clean intermittent catheterizations (CICs).MethodsMale self‐catheterizing subjects, who used hydrophilic sleeved soft/flexible CIC as the only bladder emptying method, were enrolled into a multi‐center, randomized, cross‐over study performed across six European sites. Subjects tested the MHZC, featuring a drainage zone with 120 micro‐holes and a CEC with two eyelets. The study consisted of four study visits (V0–V3), during which endpoints related to catheter performance (urinary flow‐stops, bladder emptying, and intra‐catheter pressure) were measured and two 4‐week test periods at home (T1 and T2) where dipstick hematuria and user perception between catheters were evaluated.ResultsSeventy‐three male subjects with non‐neurogenic and neurogenic bladder dysfunction (3:2) were enrolled. On average, catheterizations with the MHZC led to close to mean zero flow‐stops compared to ≥1 flow‐stops with the CEC, during both HCP‐ and self‐led catheterizations (both p < 0.001). Residual urine at first flow‐stop was significantly reduced for the MHZC compared to CEC (p = 0.001 and p = 0.004, for HCP‐ and self‐led catheterizations, respectively). This was substantiated by a significantly smaller pressure peak at first flow‐stop, a proxy for minimized mucosal suction (both HCP‐ and self‐led catheterizations, p < 0.001). After home‐use catheterizations, dipstick hematuria was comparable between catheters, whereas catheterizations were associated with significantly improved perception in favor of MHZC regarding bladder emptying, less blocking sensation, and improved hygienic catheterization compared to the CEC.ConclusionThis study confirmed the evidence of improved bladder emptying with the MHZC compared to a CEC without the need to reposition the catheter. The MHZC therefore offers an enhanced benefit for the dependent CIC user securing complete bladder emptying in an uninterrupted free flow and reducing the need to reposition the catheter during emptying.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Urology,Neurology (clinical)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3