The Middle‐Out Approach to reconceptualizing, assessing, and analyzing traumatic stress reactions

Author:

Adams Shane W.12ORCID,Layne Christopher M.3,Contractor Ateka A.4,Allwood Maureen A.5ORCID,Armour Chérie6,Inslicht Sabra S.27,Maguen Shira27

Affiliation:

1. Mental Illness Research Education and Clinical Center (MIRECC) VA San Francisco Health Care System San Francisco California USA

2. Department of Psychiatry University of California–San Francisco San Francisco California USA

3. College of Psychology Nova Southeastern University Fort Lauderdale Florida USA

4. Department of Psychology University of North Texas Denton Texas USA

5. Department of Psychology John Jay College of Criminal Justice–City University of New York New York New York USA

6. School of Psychology Queens University Belfast Belfast Northern Ireland UK

7. Mental Health Service VA San Francisco Health Care System San Francisco California USA

Abstract

AbstractAlternative models of traumatic stress and broader psychopathology have been proposed to address issues of heterogeneity, comorbidity, clinical utility, and equitable representation. However, systematic and practical methods and guidelines to organize and apply these models remain scarce. The Middle‐Out Approach is a novel, integrative, contextually informed framework for organizing and applying existing empirical methods to evaluate current and alternative traumatic stress reactions. Rather than beginning to identify traumatic stress reactions from the top‐down (i.e., disorder‐first approach) or bottom‐up (i.e., symptom‐first approach), constructs are evaluated from the middle out (i.e., presentation‐first approach), unconstrained by higher‐order disorders or lower‐order diagnostic symptoms. This approach provides innovation over previous methods at multiple levels, including the conceptualization of traumatic stress reactions as well as the type of assessments and data sources used and how they are used in statistical analyses. Conceptualizations prioritize the identification of middle‐order phenotypes, representing person‐centered clinical presentations, which are informed by the integration of multidimensional, transdiagnostic, and multimodal (e.g., psychosocial, physiological) assessments and/or data sources. Integrated data are then analyzed concurrently using person‐centered statistical models to identify precise, discrete, and representative health outcomes within broader heterogeneous samples. Subsequent variable‐centered analyses are then used to identify culturally sensitive and contextually informed correlates of phenotypes, their clinical utility, and the differential composition within and between broader traumatic stress reactions. Examples from the moral injury literature are used to illustrate practical applications that may increase clinical utility and the accurate representation of health outcomes for diverse individuals and communities.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health,Clinical Psychology

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3