Affiliation:
1. Queensland University of Technology, Australia
Abstract
Previous conceptions of the choice to home educate have focused on a dualism between ideology and pedagogy. Indeed, the discussion around home education choice frequently falls back onto these two categories to explore and explain the choice to home educate. Using empirical literature on the choice to home educate that presents the experiences of families who home educate, this chapter instead proposes a different dichotomy. Rather than ideologues and pedagogues, this chapter proposes there are two choosers based on their a priori/a posteriori relationship with schooling for their children, and, instead, they choose either because of ideological or pedagogical reasons; rather, they choose either deliberately or accidentally. Using the theoretical lens of responsibilisation, this chapter argues parents are responsibilised toward home education in response to risks they perceive. These risks could be experienced a posteriori, through direct exposure to their child's schooling, or a priori, through a belief about what schools are like.
Reference88 articles.
1. Abdullah, M. (2017). Komunikasi interpersonal guru terhadap murid penyandang autisme dalam proses belajar mengajar: Studi kasus guru terhadap murid penyandang autisme di Richmond Homeschooling (Doctoral dissertation). Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.
2. Apostoleris, N. H. (1994). An interdisciplinary investigation of home schooling (Doctoral dissertation). Wesleyan University.
3. Arai, A. B. (2000). Reasons for home schooling in Canada. Canadian Journal of Education/Revue canadienne de l'education, 204-217.
4. The risks of social reproduction: The middle class and education markets.;S. J.Ball;London Review of Education,2003
5. School choice, social class and distinction: the realization of social advantage in education
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献