Author:
Bacchini Fabio,Lorusso Ludovica
Abstract
Purpose
This study aims to explore whether face recognition technology – as it is intensely used by state and local police departments and law enforcement agencies – is racism free or, on the contrary, is affected by racial biases and/or racist prejudices, thus reinforcing overall racial discrimination.
Design/methodology/approach
The study investigates the causal pathways through which face recognition technology may reinforce the racial disproportion in enforcement; it also inquires whether it further discriminates black people by making them experience more racial discrimination and self-identify more decisively as black – two conditions that are shown to be harmful in various respects.
Findings
This study shows that face recognition technology, as it is produced, implemented and used in Western societies, reinforces existing racial disparities in stop, investigation, arrest and incarceration rates because of racist prejudices and even contributes to strengthen the unhealthy effects of racism on historically disadvantaged racial groups, like black people.
Practical implications
The findings hope to make law enforcement agencies and software companies aware that they must take adequate action against the racially discriminative effects of the use of face recognition technology.
Social implications
This study highlights that no implementation of an allegedly racism-free biometric technology is safe from the risk of racially discriminating, simply because each implementation leans against our society, which is affected by racism in many persisting ways.
Originality/value
While the ethical survey of biometric technologies is traditionally framed in the discourse of universal rights, this study explores an issue that has not been deeply scrutinized so far, that is, how face recognition technology differently affects distinct racial groups and how it contributes to racial discrimination.
Subject
Computer Networks and Communications,Sociology and Political Science,Philosophy,Communication
Reference54 articles.
1. A piece of yourself’: ethical issues in biometric identification;Ethics and Information Technology,2003
2. Congruence of mother and teacher educational expectations and low-income youth’s academic competence;Journal of Educational Psychology,2007
3. Berman, M. and Lowery, W. (2015), “The 12 key highlights from the DOJ’s scathing ferguson report”, The Washington Post, 4 march, available at: www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-nation/wp/2015/03/04/the-12-key-highlights-from-the-dojs-scathing-ferguson-report/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.c54af3894c47 (accessed 13 September 2018).
4. Big Brother Watch (2018), “Face off. The lawless growth of facial recognition in UK policing, may”, available at: https://bigbrotherwatch.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/Face-Off-final-digital-1.pdf (accessed 13 September 2018).
Cited by
45 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献