The impact of social and physical distancing measures on COVID-19 activity in England: findings from a multi-tiered surveillance system

Author:

Bernal Jamie Lopez1ORCID,Sinnathamby Mary A1ORCID,Elgohari Suzanne1,Zhao Hongxin1ORCID,Obi Chinelo1ORCID,Coughlan Laura1,Lampos Vasileios2ORCID,Simmons Ruth1,Tessier Elise1,Campbell Helen1,McDonald Suzanna1ORCID,Ellis Joanna3,Hughes Helen1ORCID,Smith Gillian1,Joy Mark45,Tripathy Manasa45ORCID,Byford Rachel45,Ferreira Filipa45ORCID,de Lusignan Simon45ORCID,Zambon Maria3ORCID,Dabrera Gavin6,Brown Kevin31ORCID,Saliba Vanessa1,Andrews Nick1,Amirthalingam Gayatri1,Mandal Sema1,Edelstein Michael1,Elliot Alex J1ORCID,Ramsay Mary1

Affiliation:

1. Public Health England COVID-19 Surveillance Cell, London, United Kingdom

2. Department of Computer Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom

3. Public Health England COVID-19 Virology Cell, London, United Kingdom

4. Royal College of General Practitioners (RCGP) Research and Surveillance Centre (RSC), London, United Kingdom

5. Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom

6. Public Health England COVID-19 Epidemiology Cell, London, United Kingdom

Abstract

Background A multi-tiered surveillance system based on influenza surveillance was adopted in the United Kingdom in the early stages of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) epidemic to monitor different stages of the disease. Mandatory social and physical distancing measures (SPDM) were introduced on 23 March 2020 to attempt to limit transmission. Aim To describe the impact of SPDM on COVID-19 activity as detected through the different surveillance systems. Methods Data from national population surveys, web-based indicators, syndromic surveillance, sentinel swabbing, respiratory outbreaks, secondary care admissions and mortality indicators from the start of the epidemic to week 18 2020 were used to identify the timing of peaks in surveillance indicators relative to the introduction of SPDM. This timing was compared with median time from symptom onset to different stages of illness and levels of care or interactions with healthcare services. Results The impact of SPDM was detected within 1 week through population surveys, web search indicators and sentinel swabbing reported by onset date. There were detectable impacts on syndromic surveillance indicators for difficulty breathing, influenza-like illness and COVID-19 coding at 2, 7 and 12 days respectively, hospitalisations and critical care admissions (both 12 days), laboratory positivity (14 days), deaths (17 days) and nursing home outbreaks (4 weeks). Conclusion The impact of SPDM on COVID-19 activity was detectable within 1 week through community surveillance indicators, highlighting their importance in early detection of changes in activity. Community swabbing surveillance may be increasingly important as a specific indicator, should circulation of seasonal respiratory viruses increase.

Publisher

European Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (ECDC)

Subject

Virology,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Epidemiology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3