Bio-priming Treatment with PGPB Strains in Cowpea Production Increases Grain Yield and Net Income
Author:
Ceritoğlu Mustafa1ORCID, Erman Murat2ORCID, Çığ Fatih3ORCID, Uçar Özge3ORCID, Soysal Sipan3ORCID, Erden Zeki3ORCID, Toprak Çağdaş Can3ORCID
Affiliation:
1. SİİRT ÜNİVERSİTESİ 2. BURSA ULUDAG UNIVERSITY 3. SIIRT UNIVERSITY
Abstract
In the 21st century, the use of beneficial microorganisms as biological fertilizers has become a notable phenomenon, driven by the ongoing search for sustainable solutions due to environmental issues associated with synthetic fertilizer use. This study aimed to investigate the effect of bio-priming with plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB) strains comparing them with synthetic fertilizer and rhizobium inoculation in Siirt ecological conditions. The field experiment was laid out according to a completely randomized design with four replications in the arable land of Siirt University (Siirt, Türkiye) during the 2019 summer season. Three synthetic fertilizer doses as diammonium phosphate (SF1: 100 kg ha-1, SF2: 200 kg ha-1, SF3: 300 kg ha-1) and seven biological fertilizer treatments (B1: TV61C, B2: TV62C, B3: TV126C, B4: TV24C, B5: TV53D, BMIX: TV119E+TV126C, RZB: Bradyrhizobium sp.) were compared with control (no fertilization+hydro-priming) in the study. The research results indicated that 300 kg ha-1 DAP and PGPB consortia showed the best results on agronomic characteristics. However, particularly when applied in the form of a consortium, PGPB strains exhibited performance very close to synthetic fertilization. Moreover, it was determined that 300 kg ha-1 DAP and PGPB consortia increased grain yield over hydro-primed plants by 54.6% and 42.4%, while they provided a net income of $654 and $721.6, respectively. Thus, bio-priming with PGPB increased higher net income compared with synthetic fertilizer due to lower treatment costs. In conclusion, bio-priming with PGPB strains has the potential of useful, sustainable and cost-effective strategy in cowpea production.
Publisher
Ataturk Universitesi
Reference42 articles.
1. Abdelaziz, A.M., Hashem, A.H., El-Sayyad, G.S., El-Wakil, D.A., Selim, S., Alkhalifah, D.H.M., & Attia, M.S. (2023). Biocontrol of soil borne diseases by plant growth promoting rhizobacteria. Tropical Plant Pathology, 48, 105–127. 2. Akbar, M., Aslam, N., Khalil, Y., Akhtar, S., Siddiqi, E.H., & Iqbal, M.S. (2019). Effects of seed priming with plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria on wheat yield and soil properties under contrasting soils. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 42(17), 2080–2091. 3. Aswathi, K.P.R., Kalaji, H.M., & Puthur, J.T. (2022). Seed priming of plants aiding in drought stress tolerance and faster recovery: A review. Plant Growth Regulation, 97, 235–253. 4. Cai, A., Xu, M., Wang, B., Zhang, W., Liang, G., Hou, E., & Luo, Y. (2019). Manure acts as a better fertilizer for increasing crop yields than synthetic fertilizer does by improving soil fertility. Soil and Tillage Research, 189, 168–175. 5. Ceritoglu, M., & Erman, M. (2020). Determination of some agronomic traits and their correlation with yield components in cowpea. Selcuk Journal of Agriculture and Food Sciences, 34(2), 154–161.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|