Documented Intraoperative Hypotension According to the Three Most Common Definitions Does Not Match the Application of Antihypotensive Medication

Author:

Franck M1,Radtke FM1,Prahs C1,Seeling M1,Papkalla N1,Wernecke K-D23,Spies CD1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Anaesthesiology and Surgical Intensive Care, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany

2. Department of Biometry, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany

3. SoStAna GmbH, Berlin, Germany

Abstract

This observational study investigated which of the three most common definitions of intraoperative hypotension (IOH), reported in a published systematic literature review, were associated best with anaesthetists' administration of antihypo-tensive medication (AHM). IOH and AHM use in anaesthetic procedures in a mixed surgical population ( n = 2350) were also reviewed. The definitions were: arterial systolic blood pressure (SBP) < 100 mmHg or a fall in SBP of > 30% of the preoperative SBP baseline; arterial SBP < 80 mmHg; a fall in SBP of > 20% of the preoperative SBP. Accuracy of predicting AHM using these three definitions was 67%, 54% and 65%, respectively. Prediction by a new fourth definition, using an optimal threshold of minimal SBP falling to < 92 mmHg or by > 24% of preoperative baseline, was 68% accurate. In multivariate logistic analysis, age, volatile versus intravenous anaesthetics, medical history of arterial hypertension and all four definitions of IOH were associated with intraoperative AHM, however IOH was not associated with postoperative in-patient stay. The three original definitions correlated poorly with the anaesthetist's judgement about applying AHM. Anaesthetists make complex decisions regarding the relevance of IOH, considering various perioperative factors in addition to SBP. Age, physical status and duration and type of surgery showed better correlations with postoperative in-patient stay than IOH.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Biochemistry, medical,Cell Biology,Biochemistry,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3