Validation and comparison of multiple risk scores for prediction of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage after intravenous thrombolysis in VISTA

Author:

Wang Yanan1ORCID,Liu Junfeng1,Wu Qian1,Cheng Yajun1,Liu Ming1,

Affiliation:

1. Department of Neurology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China

Abstract

Background and aims: Prediction models/scores may help to identify patients at high risk of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH) after intravenous thrombolysis. We aimed to validate and compare the performance of different prediction models for sICH after thrombolysis using direct model estimation in the Virtual International Stroke Trials Archive (VISTA). Methods: We searched PubMed for potentially eligible prediction models from inception to 1 June 2019. Simple and practical models/scores were validated in VISTA. The primary outcome was sICH based on two criteria (National Institute of Neurological Diseases and Stroke, NINDS; Safe Implementation of Thrombolysis in Stroke-Monitoring Study, SITS-MOST) and the secondary outcome was parenchymal hematoma (PH). The discrimination performance of each model was evaluated using area under the curve (AUC) and calibration was evaluated by Hosmer–Lemeshow goodness-of-fit tests. Results: We found 13 prediction models and five models (HAT, MSS, SPAN-100, GRASPS and THRIVE) were finally validated in VISTA. A total of 1884 participants were eligible for our study, of whom the proportion with sICH was 4.6% (87/1884) per NINDS and 3.9% (73/1884) per SITS-MOST, and with PH was 11.3% (213/1884). MSS and GRASPS had the greatest predictive ability for sICH (NINDS criteria: MSS AUC 0.7, 95% CI 0.63–0.77, p < 0.001; GRASPS AUC 0.69, 95% CI 0.63–0.76, p < 0.001; SITS-MOST criteria: MSS, AUC 0.76, 95% CI 0.68–0.85, p < 0.001; GRASPS, AUC 0.79, 95% CI 0.71–0.87, p < 0.001). Similar results were found for PH (MSS AUC 0.68, 95% CI 0.64–0.73, p = 0.017; GRASPS AUC 0.68, 95% CI 0.63–0.72, p = 0.017). The calibration of each model was almost good. Conclusion: MSS and GRASPS had good discrimination and calibration for sICH and PH after thrombolysis as assessed in VISTA. These two models could be used in clinical practice and clinical trials to identity individuals with high risk of sICH.

Funder

the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation

the Major International (Regional) Joint Research Project, National Natural Science Foundation of China

the 1-3-5 project for disciplines of excellence, West China Hospital, Sichuan University

National Natural Science Foundation of China

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Neurology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3