Effects of Electrical Stimulation at Different Frequencies on Regeneration of Transected Peripheral Nerve

Author:

Lu Ming-Chin1,Ho Chien-Yi2,Hsu Sheng-Feng3,Lee Han-Chung4,Lin Jia-Horng5,Yao Chun-Hsu6,Chen Yueh-Sheng7

Affiliation:

1. School of Post Baccalaureate Chinese Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan

2. Laboratory of Biomaterials, Graduate Institute of Chinese Medical Science, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan

3. School of Chinese Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan

4. Graduate Institute of Integration and Western Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan, Division of Neurosurgery, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan

5. Laboratory of Fiber Application and Manufacturing, Graduated Institute of Textile Engineering, Feng Chia University, Taichung Taiwan

6. Institute of Biomedical Engineering and Material Science, Central Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Taichung, Taiwan

7. Laboratory of Biomaterials, Graduate Institute of Chinese Medical Science, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan,

Abstract

Background. Electrical stimulation of damaged peripheral nerve may aid regeneration. Objective. The purpose of this study was to determine whether 1 mA of percutaneous electrical stimulation at 1, 2, 20, or 200 Hz augments regeneration between the proximal and distal nerve stumps. Methods. A10-mm gap was made in rat sciatic nerve by suturing the stumps into silicone rubber tubes. A control group received no stimulation. Starting 1 week after transection, electrical stimulation was applied between the cathode placed at the distal stump and the anode at the proximal stump every other day for 6 weeks. Results. Higher frequency stimulation led to less regeneration compared to lower frequencies. Quantitative histology of the successfully regenerated nerves revealed that the groups receiving electrical treatment, especially at 2 Hz, had a more mature structure with a smaller cross-sectional area, more myelinated fibers, higher axon density, and higher ratio of blood vessel to total nerve area compared with the controls. Electrophysiology showed significantly shorter latency, longer duration, and faster conduction velocity. Conclusion. Electrical stimulation can have either a positive or negative impact on peripheral nerve regeneration. Clinical trials that combine stimulation with rehabilitation must determine the parameters that are most likely to be safe and effective.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

General Medicine

全球学者库

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"全球学者库"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前全球学者库共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2023 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3