Ethical considerations about the collection of biological samples for genetic analysis in clinical trials

Author:

Galende-Domínguez Inés123,Rivero-Lezcano Octavio M4567ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Unidad de Apoyo SG Formación y ADS, Spain

2. D.G. de Investigación, Docencia y Documentación

3. Consejería de Sanidad, Comunidad de Madrid. Spain

4. Complejo Asistencial Universitario de León-Unidad de Investigación, Spain

5. Gerencia Regional de Salud de Castilla y León (SACYL), Spain

6. Institute of Biomedical Research of Salamanca (IBSAL), Spain

7. Institute of Biomedicine. University of León, Spain

Abstract

Progress in precision medicine is being achieved through the design of clinical trials that use genetic biomarkers to guide stratification of patients and assignation to treatment or control groups. Genetic analysis of biomarkers is, therefore, essential to complete their objectives, and this involves the study of biological samples from donor patients that have been recruited according to criteria previously established in the design of the clinical trial. Nevertheless, it is becoming very common that, in the solicitation of biological samples, purposes that are beyond the objectives of the stated therapeutic trial research are introduced, like the development of ill-explained exploratory studies or the use in unspecified future research. In the digital era, the sequencing of patients’ DNA needs to be considered as a serious security matter, not only for the patients, but also for their relatives. Genetic information may be easily stored, even forever, in digital files. This engenders a permanent risk of being stolen or misused in many ways. Furthermore, re-identification of sample donors is technically feasible through their genetic data. For these reasons, genetic analysis of samples collected in clinical trials should be restricted to the accomplishment of their main objectives or well justified goals.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Philosophy,Education

Reference19 articles.

1. Engaging key stakeholders to overcome barriers to studying the quality of research ethics oversight

2. Berger KM, Roderick J (2014) National and transnational security implications of big data in the life sciences. Available at: https://www.aaas.org/sites/default/files/AAAS-FBI-UNICRI_Big_Data_Report_111014.pdf (accessed 24 November 2022).

3. Privacy challenges and research opportunities for genomic data sharing

4. Research Ethics Recommendations for Whole-Genome Research: Consensus Statement

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Pharmacogenomics in clinical trials: an overview;Frontiers in Pharmacology;2023-10-20

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3