Disparities in Drug-Eluting Stent Utilization in Patients With Acute ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: An Analysis of the National Inpatient Sample

Author:

Bhasin Varun1ORCID,Hiltner Emily1,Singh Anjuli1,Elsaid Ossama1,Awasthi Ashish2,Kassotis John1ORCID,Sethi Ankur2

Affiliation:

1. Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA

2. Division of Cardiology, Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital, New Brunswick, NJ, USA

Abstract

The superiority of drug-eluting stents (DES) compared with bare-metal stents (BMS) is well-established, but data regarding DES use in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) as a function of race is limited. Our goal was to examine stent utilization patterns and disparities based on race, sex, and insurance status in patients with STEMI undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. The National Inpatient Sample database was used to retrospectively compare DES vs BMS use in patients admitted with STEMI from 2009 to 2018. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to assess the independent predictors of DES use. DES utilization increased significantly from 62.8% in 2009 to 94.0% in 2018. However, African Americans were less likely to receive a DES (odds ratio [OR] .82, 95% confidence interval [CI] .77–.87) compared with Caucasians. Women were more likely to undergo DES implantation (OR 1.07, 95% CI 1.05–1.10). Patients insured by Medicaid (OR .84, 95% CI .80–.89) and those classified as Self-pay (OR .63, 95% CI .61–.66) were less likely to undergo DES implantation compared to those with private insurance (OR 1.33, 95% CI 1.29–1.38). Disparities based on race and insurance status continue to persist despite a significant increase in DES utilization in STEMI patients across the identified subgroups.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3