Optimization of duplex velocity criteria for diagnosis of internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis: A report of the Intersocietal Accreditation Commission (IAC) Vascular Testing Division Carotid Diagnostic Criteria Committee

Author:

Gornik Heather L1ORCID,Rundek Tatjana2,Gardener Hannah2,Benenati James F3,Dahiya Nirvikar4,Hamburg Naomi M5,Kupinski Ann Marie67,Leers Steven A8,Lilly Michael P9,Lohr Joann M10,Pellerito John S11,Rholl Kenneth S12,Vickery Melissa A13,Hutchisson Marge S14,Needleman Laurence15

Affiliation:

1. Harrington Heart and Vascular Institute, University Hospitals, Cleveland, OH, USA

2. Department of Neurology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA

3. Miami Cardiac and Vascular Institute, Baptist Hospital of Miami, Miami, FL, USA

4. Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA

5. Whitaker Cardiovascular Institute, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA

6. Albany Medical College, Albany, NY, USA

7. North Country Vascular Diagnostics, Inc., Altamont, NY, USA

8. Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA

9. Department of Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MA, USA

10. Department of Surgery, Wm. Jennings Bryan Dorn VA Medical Center, Columbia, SC, USA

11. Department of Radiology, Northwell Health and Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Manhasset, NY, USA

12. Department of Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology, Inova Alexandria Hospital, George Washington University, Alexandria, VA, USA

13. VSA Vascular Lab, Vascular Surgery Associates, Richmond, VA, USA

14. Intersocietal Accreditation Commission (IAC), Vascular Testing Division, Ellicott City, MD, USA

15. Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospitals, Philadelphia, PA, USA

Abstract

Diagnostic criteria to classify severity of internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis vary across vascular laboratories. Consensus-based criteria, proposed by the Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound in 2003 (SRUCC), have been broadly implemented but have not been adequately validated. We conducted a multicentered, retrospective correlative imaging study of duplex ultrasound versus catheter angiography for evaluation of severity of ICA stenosis. Velocity data were abstracted from bilateral duplex studies performed between 1/1/2009 and 12/31/2015 and studies were interpreted using SRUCC. Percentage ICA stenosis was determined using North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) methodology. Receiver operating characteristic analysis evaluated the performance of SRUCC parameters compared with angiography. Of 448 ICA sides (from 224 patients), 299 ICA sides (from 167 patients) were included. Agreement between duplex ultrasound and angiography was moderate (κ = 0.42), with overestimation of degree of stenosis for both moderate (50–69%) and severe (⩾ 70%) ICA lesions. The primary SRUCC parameter for ⩾ 50% ICA stenosis of peak-systolic velocity (PSV) of ⩾ 125 cm/sec did not meet prespecified thresholds for adequate sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy (sensitivity 97.8%, specificity 64.2%, accuracy 74.5%). Test performance was improved by raising the PSV threshold to ⩾ 180 cm/sec (sensitivity 93.3%, specificity 81.6%, accuracy 85.2%) or by adding the additional parameter of ICA/common carotid artery (CCA) PSV ratio ⩾ 2.0 (sensitivity 94.3%, specificity 84.3%, accuracy 87.4%). For ⩾ 70% ICA stenosis, analysis was limited by a low number of cases with angiographically severe disease. Interpretation of carotid duplex examinations using SRUCC resulted in significant overestimation of severity of ICA stenosis when compared with angiography; raising the PSV threshold for ⩾ 50% ICA stenosis to ⩾ 180 cm/sec as a single parameter or requiring the ICA/CCA PSV ratio ⩾ 2.0 in addition to PSV of ⩾ 125 cm/sec for laboratories using the SRUCC is recommended to improve the accuracy of carotid duplex examinations.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cited by 22 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3