Feasibility and Acceptability of Facilitated Advance Care Planning in Outpatient Clinics: A Qualitative Study of Patient and Caregivers Experiences

Author:

Marshall Kate H.1ORCID,Riddiford-Harland Diane L.2,Meller Anne E.3,Caplan Gideon A.45,Naganathan Vasi67,Cullen John67,Gonski Peter8,Zwar Nicholas A.910,O’Keeffe Julie-Ann11,Krysinska Karolina12,Rhee Joel J.110

Affiliation:

1. UNSW Academic General Practice Network, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia

2. School of Medicine, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia

3. Advance Care Planning Services, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia

4. Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia

5. Department of Geriatric Medicine, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia

6. Centre for Education and Research on Ageing (CERA), Department of Geriatric Medicine, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia

7. Concord Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia

8. Southcare Aged and Extended Community Care, Sutherland Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia

9. Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Bond University, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia

10. School of Population Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia

11. Aged, Chronic Care and Rehabilitation, Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, NSW, Australia

12. Centre for Primary Health Care and Equity, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia

Abstract

Guidelines recommend advance care planning (ACP) for people with advanced illness; however, evidence supporting ACP as a component of outpatient care is lacking. We sought to establish the feasibility and acceptability of a facilitated ACP intervention for people attending tertiary outpatient clinics. Data from 20 semi-structured interviews with patient ( M = 79.3 ± 7.7, 60% male) and caregiver ( M = 68.1 ± 11.0, 60% female) participants recruited as part of a pragmatic, randomized controlled trial (RCT) were analyzed using qualitative descriptive methodology. Patients were randomized to intervention (e.g., facilitated support) or control (e.g., standard care). Intervention patients expressed high satisfaction, reporting the facilitated ACP session was clear, straightforward, and suited to their needs. Intervention caregivers did not report any significant concerns with the facilitated ACP process. Control participants reported greater difficulty completing ACP compared to intervention participants. Embedding facilitated ACP into tertiary outpatient care appears feasible and acceptable for people with advanced illnesses.

Funder

Department of Health, New South Wales Government

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Geriatrics and Gerontology,Gerontology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3