Contextual factors for the successful implementation of self-management interventions for chronic diseases: A qualitative review of reviews

Author:

Noordman Janneke1ORCID,Meurs Maaike1,Poortvliet Rune1,Rusman Tamara1,Orrego-Villagran Carola2345,Ballester Marta2345,Ninov Lyudmil6,de Guzmán Ena Niño7,Alonso-Coello Pablo7,Groene Oliver8,Suñol Rosa2345,Heijmans Monique1,Wagner Cordula19

Affiliation:

1. Netherlands institute for health services research (Nivel), Utrecht, The Netherlands

2. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

3. Avedis Donabedian Research Institute (FAD), Barcelona, Spain

4. Health Services Research Network on Chronic Diseases (REDISSEC), Madrid, Spain

5. Network for Research on Chronicity, Primary Care, and Health Promotion (RICAPPS), Barcelona, Spain

6. European Patients’ Forum, Brussels, Belgium

7. Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), Barcelona, Spain

8. OptiMedis, Hamburg, Germany

9. Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Abstract

Objectives To identify and describe the most relevant contextual factors (CFs) from the literature that influence the successful implementation of self-management interventions (SMIs) for patients living with type 2 diabetes mellitus, obesity, COPD and/or heart failure. Methods We conducted a qualitative review of reviews. Four databases were searched, 929 reviews were identified, 460 screened and 61 reviews met the inclusion criteria. CFs in this paper are categorized according to the Tailored Implementation for Chronic Diseases framework. Results A great variety of CFs was identified on several levels, across all four chronic diseases. Most CFs were on the level of the patient, the professional and the interaction level, while less CFs were obtained on the level of the intervention, organization, setting and national level. No differences in main themes of CFs across all four diseases were found. Discussion For the successful implementation of SMIs, it is crucial to take CFs on several levels into account simultaneously. Person-centered care, by tailoring SMIs to patients’ needs and circumstances, may increase the successful uptake, application and implementation of SMIs in real-life practice. The next step will be to identify the most important CFs according to various stakeholders through a group consensus process.

Funder

European Union’s Horizon 2020

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Health Policy,General Medicine

Reference85 articles.

1. WHO. Noncommunicable diseases, https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/noncommunicable-diseases (2021, 2022).

2. European Commission classifies obesity as a chronic disease

3. ECDA. Chronic diseases in Europe, https://alliancechronicdiseases.org/wp-content/uploads/Guide-for-European-Commissioner-for-Health-Chronic-diseases-in-Europe-ECDA-2019.pdf (2019).

4. The expert patient: a new approach to chronic disease management for the twenty-first century

5. EUCommission. Pilot project on the promotion of self-care in chronic diseases in the European Union. 2019.

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3