Supporting lay carers in end of life care: current gaps and future priorities

Author:

Grande G1,Stajduhar K2,Aoun S3,Toye C4,Funk L5,Addington-Hall J6,Payne S7,Todd C8

Affiliation:

1. School of Nursing, Midwifery & Social Work, University of Manchester, Manchester,

2. School of Nursing and Centre on Aging, University of Victoria, Centre on Aging, Victoria, British Columbia

3. Western Australian Centre for Cancer and Palliative Care, Curtin University of Technology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Perth, Western Australia

4. School of Nursing and Midwifery, Curtin University of Technology, Bentley, Western Australia

5. Centre on Aging, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia

6. School of Nursing & Midwifery, University of Southampton, Southampton

7. International Observatory on End of Life Care, University of Lancaster, Lancaster; Institute for Health Research, Lancaster University, Lancaster

8. School of Nursing, Midwifery & Social Work, University of Manchester, Manchester

Abstract

Informal carers are central to the achievement of end of life care and death at home and to policy aims of enabling patient choice towards end of life. They provide a substantial, yet hidden contribution to our economy. This entails considerable personal cost to carers, and it is recognised that their needs should be assessed and addressed. However, we lack good research evidence on how best to do this. The present position paper gives an overview of the current state of carer research, its gaps and weaknesses, and outlines future priorities. It draws on a comprehensive review of the carer literature and a consensus meeting by experts in the field. Carers’ needs and adverse effects of caregiving have been extensively researched. In contrast, we lack both empirical longitudinal research and conceptual models to establish how adverse effects may be prevented through appropriate support. A reactive, “repair” approach predominates. Evaluations of existing interventions provide limited information, due to limited rigour in design and the wide variety in types of intervention evaluated. Further research is required into the particular challenges that the dual role of carers as both clients and providers pose for intervention design, suggesting a need for future emphasis on positive aspects of caregiving and empowerment. We require more longitudinal research and user involvement to aid development of interventions and more experimental and quasi-experimental research to evaluate them, with better utilisation of the natural experiments afforded by intra- and international differences in service provision.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine,General Medicine

Reference43 articles.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3