Development and Outcomes of Returning Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon Exposure Results in the Washington Heights, NYC Community

Author:

Riley Kylie W12,Burke Kimberly12,Dixon Holly3ORCID,Holmes Darrell12,Calero Lehyla12,Barton Michael4,Miller Rachel L5,Bramer Lisa M6ORCID,Waters Katrina M46,Anderson Kim A4,Herbstman Julie12,Rohlman Diana7

Affiliation:

1. Columbia Center for Children’s Environmental Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA

2. Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA

3. Environmental and Molecular Toxicology, Food Safety and Environmental Stewardship Program, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA

4. Department of Environmental and Molecular Toxicology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA

5. Division of Clinical Immunology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA

6. Biological Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, USA

7. School of Nutrition and Public Health, College of Health, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA

Abstract

Report-back of research results (RBRR) is becoming standard practice for environmental health research studies. RBRR is thought to increase environmental health literacy (EHL), although standardized measurements are limited. For this study, we developed a report back document on exposure to air pollutants, Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons, during pregnancy through community engaged research and evaluated whether the report increased EHL. We used focus groups and surveys to gather feedback on the report document from an initial group of study participants (Group 1, n = 22) and then sent the revised report to a larger number of participants (Group 2, n = 168). We conducted focus groups among participants in Group 1 and discussed their suggested changes to the report and how those changes could be implemented. Participants in focus groups demonstrated multiple levels of EHL. While participant engagement critically informed report development, a survey comparing feedback from Group 1 (initial report) and Group 2 (revised report) did not show a significant difference in the ease of reading the report or knowledge gained about air pollutants. We acknowledge that our approach was limited by a lack of EHL tools that assess knowledge and behavior change, and a reliance on quantitative methodologies. Future approaches that merge qualitative and quantitative methodologies to evaluate RBRR and methodologies for assessing RBRR materials and subsequent changes in knowledge, attitudes, and behavior, may be necessary.

Funder

National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences

National Institutes of Health

Publisher

SAGE Publications

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3