Intraoperative assessment of the curative potential to predict survival after gastric cancer resection: A national cohort study

Author:

Linder Gustav1ORCID,McGregor Richard J.2,Lindblad Mats3

Affiliation:

1. Department of Surgical Sciences Uppsala University Ingång 70, 1 tr SE-751 85 Uppsala Sweden

2. Clinical Surgery, The University of Edinburgh, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK

3. Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden

Abstract

Background: The surgeon’s intraoperative assessment of the curative potential of tumor resection following gastrectomy adds new information that could help clinicians and patients by predicting survival. Methods: All patients in Sweden undergoing gastric cancer resection between 2006 and 2018 were grouped according to a prospectively registered variable; the surgeon’s intraoperative assessment of the curative potential of surgery: curative, borderline curative, or palliative. Factors affecting group allocation were analyzed with multivariable logistic regression, while survival was analyzed using multivariable Cox regression and the Kaplan–Meier method. Positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated. Results: Of 2341 patients undergoing gastric cancer resection, 1547 (71%) were deemed curative, 340 (15%) borderline curative, and 314 (14%) palliative (140 missing assessments). Advanced stage increased the risk of borderline curative resection (Stage III, odds ratio (OR) = 6.04, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 3.92–9.31), as did emergency surgery OR = 3.31 (1.74–6.31) and blood loss >500 mL; OR = 1.63 (1.06–2.49). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and multidisciplinary team (MDT) discussion both decreased the risk of borderline curative resection, OR = 0.58 (0.39–0.87) and 0.57 (0.40–0.80), respectively. In multivariable Cox regression, the surgeon’s assessment independently predicted worse survival for borderline curative (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.54, 95% CI = 1.29–1.83) and palliative resections (HR = 1.76, 95% CI = 1.45–2.19), compared to curative resections. The sensitivity of the surgeon’s assessment of long-term survival was 96.7%. The PPV was 50.7% and the NPV was 92.1%. Conclusion: The surgeon’s intraoperative assessment of the curative potential of gastric cancer surgery may independently aid survival prediction and is analogous to prognostication by pathologic Staging. Advanced disease, emergency surgery, and a high intraoperative blood loss, increases the risk of a borderline curative or palliative resection. Conversely, neoadjuvant treatment and MDT discussion reduce the risk of borderline curative or palliative resection.

Funder

Bengt Ihres Foundation

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Surgery

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3