Are Online Congregations Representative? Exploring Resource and Political Differences

Author:

Djupe Paul A.1,Gilliland Claire C.2ORCID,Olson Shayla F.3

Affiliation:

1. Denison University, Granville, OH, USA

2. Furman University, Greenville, SC, USA

3. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA

Abstract

Social scientists are paying a growing amount of attention to the online presence of American congregations and not just because of the COVID-19 shutdowns. In part, text-as-data analytic techniques have made religious communication a viable area of study in addition to existing qualitative methods. Given the existing biases in terms of which congregations post sermons online, an important next step is to investigate potential political biases in which congregations are sharing or streaming their services. Drawing on data from the most recent National Congregations Study wave in 2018 to 2019 as well as reports of political content from individuals in a national survey from October 2020, we document the nature of the biases in which congregations are likely to be online and what the political consequences may be. While resources explain some of the likelihood for being online, we also find evidence for a link between more frequent clergy political speech and a higher likelihood of the congregation having an online presence. As scholars take advantage of the accessibility and availability of online worship services and sermons, it is essential to have a better understanding of which congregations they are sampling and lacking.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Reference49 articles.

1. The Political Activities of Religious Congregations in the United States

2. Political Speech in Religious Sermons

3. Assessing Conventional Wisdom about Religion and Politics: A Preliminary View from the Pews

4. Race and the Power of Sermons on American Politics

5. Burge Ryan P. 2021. “Why ‘Evangelical’ Is Becoming Another Word for ‘Republican’.” Retrieved December 30, 2021 (https://www.nytimes.com/2021/10/26/opinion/evangelical-republican.html).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.7亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2025 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3