Calafiore cardioplegia offers better myocardial protection in adult and senescent rat hearts than Del Nido cardioplegia

Abstract

Objectives We compared the cardioprotective capacity of Del Nido cardioplegia and warm Calafiore blood cardioplegia in an experimental setting during 90 min of ischaemia. Methods 20 adult and 20 senescent rat hearts were isolated and mounted on a blood-perfused, pressure-controlled Langendorff apparatus. After a stabilization period, cardiac arrest (90 min) was induced by the administration of either Calafiore (Cala) or Del Nido solution (DNS). While Cala was given warm and intermittently, DNS was given as a cold single shot. During 90 min of reperfusion, cardiac function and metabolism were evaluated and biomarker levels were measured. After the end of the experiment, hearts were prepared for electronmicroscopic investigation. Results Hearts exposed to Cala recovered faster during reperfusion compared with hearts administered DNS (Cala vs DNS at 30 min reperfusion: left ventricular developed pressure 72, SD: 22% of baseline (BL) versus 40, SD: 32% of BL, p < .001, and positive derived left ventricular pressure over time was better in both adult and senescent Cala groups (96, SD: 31% of BL) than in the DNS groups (39, SD: 27% of BL, p < .001). Ischaemic contractures were seen in the DNS groups starting after 30 min of ischaemia, whereas no rise in diastolic pressure was observed for the Cala groups. Accordingly, lactate production was higher after DNS (1.23 mg/dl (SD 0.87) than after Cala (0.33 mg/dl (SD 0.68), p = .015) at the beginning of reperfusion. Troponin I levels at the end of reperfusion were higher after DNS treatment in adult hearts (DNS: 287.9 SD: 147.7 ng/mL vs Cala 91.2: SD: 94.7 ng/mL, p = .02) and in senescent hearts (DNS: 376.5 (SD: 162.8) ng/ml versus Cala 104.7 (SD: 150.2) ng/ml, p = .025). Electron microscopy showed that the cellular oedema index was higher in adult DNS hearts (1.2 ± 0.2) than in adult Cala hearts (0.8 ± 0.1, p = .012), whereas the VS ratio was similar (0.18 ± 0.01 vs 0.17 ± 0.03). Conclusion Calafiore cardioplegia offers better myocardial protection from ischaemia/reperfusion-related damage in isolated perfused adult and senescent rat hearts than Del Nido cardioplegia.