Antenatal Clinic Waiting Time, Patient Satisfaction, and Preference for Staggered Appointment–A Cross-Sectional Study

Author:

Abdus-salam RA1ORCID,Adeniyi AA2,Bello FA1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Clinical Sciences, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan/University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria

2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria

Abstract

Time spent in the antenatal clinic (ANC) is a major disincentive for pregnant women and constitutes a barrier to the utilization of ANC. Long waiting time and poor patient satisfaction may contribute to poor utilization. This study assessed waiting time, patients’ satisfaction, and preference for staggered ANC appointments. A cross-sectional study was conducted; information obtained includes sociodemographic and obstetric characteristics, and time spent at ANC service points. Data were analyzed using International Business Machines (IBM) Statistical Products and Service Solutions (SPSS) software version 23. Descriptive statistics and chi-square test were conducted. Level of significance: P < .05. One hundred and twenty-two participants were interviewed. Mean age was 30.52 (±4.65) years, they were mostly multi-gravid, married, and with tertiary education. Mean time spent in ANC and waiting time were 191 min and 143 min, respectively. Waiting time was longest at doctor's consultation (59 min), laboratory services (38 min), and the cash pay-point (18 min). About 68.9% were satisfied with services and highest at doctors’ consultation. Satisfaction was associated with waiting time of <45 min. Dissatisfaction was high at the cash pay-point (28.7%), followed by the laboratory (16.4%). About 56.5% preferred staggered appointments. Time spent in ANC should be reduced and staggered appointments may be a useful strategy to reduce waiting time and patient load.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Health Policy,Health (social science),Leadership and Management

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3