Affiliation:
1. Department of Special Education and Communication Disorders,
University of Nebraska/Lincoln
Abstract
ABSIRACT: The relationship between efficacy and selected instructional vareables was explored for two types of special education teachers. Teachers were categorized either as direct service providers, who provided direct instruction or behavioral interventions to students with mild disabilities, or as indirect service providers, who spent at least 50% of their time consulting, collaborating, or team teaching with general educators. Significant positive correlations found between efficacy and three instructionally-relevant factors were for both types of teachers. Type of service was related to only one instructional component, Instructional Experimentation. Recommendations for teacher education are addressed.
Reference38 articles.
1. Allington, R.L. & McGill-Franzen, A. (1989). Different programs, indifferent instruction. In D. Lipsky & A. Gartner (Eds.), Beyond separate education (pp. 75-97). New York: Brookes.
2. Teacher Efficacy: A Motivational Paradigm for Effective Teacher Education
3. Bandura, A. (1981). Self-referent thought: A developmental analysis of self-efficacy. In J. Flavell & L. Ross (Eds.), Social cognitive development: Frontiers and possible future (pp. 200-239). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cited by
397 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献