Automated Macular Fluid Volume As a Treatment Indicator for Diabetic Macular Edema

Author:

Tsuboi Kotaro1ORCID,You Qi Sheng12,Guo Yukun1,Wang Jie13,Flaxel Christina J.1ORCID,Bailey Steven T.1,Huang David1,Jia Yali13,Hwang Thomas S.1

Affiliation:

1. Casey Eye Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA

2. Kresge Eye Institute, Detroit Medical Center, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA

3. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA

Abstract

Introduction: To assess the diagnostic accuracy of automatically quantified macular fluid volume (MFV) for treatment-required diabetic macular edema (DME). Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional study included eyes with DME. The commercial software on optical coherence tomography (OCT) produced the central subfield thickness (CST), and a custom deep-learning algorithm automatically segmented the fluid cysts and quantified the MFV from the volumetric scans of an OCT angiography system. Retina specialists treated patients per standard of care based on clinical and OCT findings without access to the MFV. The main outcome measures were the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), sensitivity, and specificity of the CST, MFV, and visual acuity (VA) for treatment indication. Results: Of 139 eyes, 39 (28%) were treated for DME during the study period and 101 (72%) were previously treated. The algorithm detected fluid in all eyes; however, only 54 eyes (39%) met the DRCR.net criteria for center-involved ME. The AUROC of MFV predicting a treatment decision of 0.81 was greater than that of CST (0.67) ( P = .0048). Untreated eyes that met the optimal threshold for treatment-required DME based on MFV (>0.031 mm3) had better VA than treated eyes ( P = .0053). A multivariate logistic regression model showed that MFV ( P = .0008) and VA ( P = .0061) were significantly associated with a treatment decision, but CST was not. Conclusions: MFV had a higher correlation with the need for treatment for DME than CST and may be especially useful for ongoing management of DME.

Funder

Foundation for the National Institutes of Health

Research to Prevent Blindness

William & Mary Greve Special Scholar Award

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

General Medicine

全球学者库

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"全球学者库"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前全球学者库共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2023 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3