Immunotherapy for ocular myasthenia gravis: an observational study in Japan

Author:

Narita Tomoko1,Nakane Shunya12ORCID,Nagaishi Akiko1,Minami Naoya3,Niino Masaaki3,Kawaguchi Naoki4,Murai Hiroyuki56ORCID,Kira Jun-ichi5,Shimizu Jun7,Iwasa Kazuo8,Yoshikawa Hiroaki89,Hatanaka Yuki10,Sonoo Masahiro10,Shimizu Yuko11,Matsuo Hidenori121ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Neurology, National Hospital Organization, Nagasaki Kawatana Medical Center, Nagasaki, Japan

2. Department of Neurology, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan

3. Department of Neurology, National Hospital Organization, Hokkaido Medical Center, Sapporo, Japan

4. Neurological Center, Neurology Chiba Clinic, Chiba, Japan

5. Department of Neurology, Neurological Institute, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan

6. Department of Neurology, International University of Health and Welfare, Tokyo, Japan

7. Department of Neurology, Tokyo University, Tokyo, Japan

8. Department of Neurology and Neurobiology of Aging, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Japan

9. Health Service Center, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Japan

10. Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, Teikyo University, Tokyo, Japan

11. Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, Tokyo Women’s Medical University, Tokyo, Japan

12. Department of Neurology, National Hospital Organization, Nagasaki National Hospital, Sakuragi-cho 6-41, Nagasaki 850-8523, Japan

Abstract

Background: Treatment for ocular myasthenia gravis (OMG) has not yet been well established. Few reports have been published on the clinical practice and outcomes of OMG. Objectives: We investigated treatment of OMG and its outcomes in Japan. Design: We performed a retrospective cross-sectional survey of OMG patients from eight hospitals in Japan. Methods: Clinical information, including sex, age at onset, initial symptoms, autoantibodies, clinical course, treatment history, complications, and outcomes, was obtained. In addition, we recorded the total number of patients with MG and OMG separately. Results: In total, 135 patients with OMG (67 men, 68 women) were included. Treatment of OMG was not simple and involved various immunotherapeutic strategies. Eight patients went into remission spontaneously without immunotherapy. A total of 117 patients showed improvements after treatment, whereas 10 patients showed refractory responses to treatment. Overall outcomes were good; however, symptoms persisted in 60.7% of patients even after treatment. Among 90 patients who received immunotherapy, only two showed a refractory response. Meanwhile, for 45 patients who did not receive immunotherapy, 8 were refractory. Thus, the rate of refractory disease in the group with immunotherapy was significantly lower ( p = 0.001, u-test) than in the group without immunotherapy. The proportion of generalized MG patients among all MG cases was low in medical centers where immunotherapy for OMG was frequently performed. Conclusion: Although the overall prognosis for patients with OMG was good, symptoms remained in more than half of the patients. Immunotherapy, including corticosteroids, may be beneficial for patients with OMG. Plain language summary Is immunosuppressive therapy beneficial for myasthenia gravis patients with ocular symptoms only? Patients with ocular myasthenia gravis (OMG) have only eye symptoms for more than 2 years. Whether this condition is an initial stage of the disease before eventually progressing to generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG) is still uncertain. Different from gMG, OMG is not life-threatening. But eye symptoms often cause troublesome problems in life. Doctors have treated OMG patients similarly to patients with gMG. There is no standard clinical practice for OMG. In this study, we examined how patients with OMG were treated at eight different specialist centers in Japan. In 135 patients with OMG, 8 patients became symptom free without treatment, 117 patients showed improvements after treatment, whereas 10 patients did not get well. Overall outcomes were good, but symptoms remained in 60.7% of patients even after treatment. Among 90 patients who received one or more immunotherapies, only 2 did not get well. Meanwhile, for 45 patients who did not receive immunotherapy, 8 remained ill. We found that treatment of OMG was not simple and often needed multiple immunotherapies. Administering immunotherapy, including corticosteroids, may be beneficial for patients with OMG.

Funder

The Ministry of Health, Labor, and Welfare, Japan and the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology of Japan

The Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Neurology (clinical),Neurology,Pharmacology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3