Factors influencing self-management priority setting and decision-making among Chinese patients with acute coronary syndrome and type 2 diabetes mellitus

Author:

Liu Xian-Liang12,Willis Karen34,Fulbrook Paul567,Wu Chiung-Jung (Jo)89,Shi Yan2,Johnson Maree1011

Affiliation:

1. Shenzhen Nanshan People’s Hospital, Shenzhen, China

2. Tenth People’s Hospital of Tongji University, China

3. School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Australia

4. Allied Health, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Australia

5. School of Nursing, Midwifery and Paramedicine, Australian Catholic University, Australia

6. Nursing Research and Practice Development Centre, The Prince Charles Hospital, Australia

7. Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, South Africa

8. School of Nursing, Midwifery and Paramedicine, University of the Sunshine Coast, Australia

9. Mater Medical Research Institute-University of Queensland, Australia

10. Faculty of Health Sciences, Australian Catholic University, Australia

11. Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Liverpool, Sydney, Australia

Abstract

Background: Priority setting and decision-making in relation to self-management of multiple conditions is particularly challenging for both patients and health professionals. The aim of this study was to validate a conceptual model of self-management priority setting and decision-making in multimorbidity and confirm factors that influence self-management prioritizing and decision-making in a sample of patients with acute coronary syndrome and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Methods: This was a qualitative study using deductive directed content analysis. A purposive sample of 21 participants with acute coronary syndrome and type 2 diabetes mellitus that were admitted to a Shanghai hospital were interviewed. Results: Participants provided evidence to confirm all but one of the factors from the conceptual model. Internal factors influencing self-management predominated. Agreement with recommended treatment, functional capacity and perceived synergies, antagonistic effects, or interactions among the conditions and prescribed treatments, was emphasized. The facilitators and barriers to priority setting and decision-making were related to available resources, provider communication and, to a lesser extent, confusion about recommendations, and treatment complexity. Some participants were also concerned about treatment side effects. Conclusions: Internal factors (personal beliefs, preferences, and attitudes) and facilitators and barriers (knowledge, finances, social support, and transportation) were related to changes in priority setting and decision-making and self-management behavior in this sample. Health education, which includes case studies with shifting self-management priorities is recommended, rather than a unique disease-specific focus. Further research, exploring the relationship between these factors and changes in the dominant condition and related management, using valid and reliable instruments that capture these key factors, is recommended.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Advanced and Specialized Nursing,Medical–Surgical Nursing,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

全球学者库

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"全球学者库"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前全球学者库共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2023 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3