Virtual Rehabilitation and COVID-19: Varied Adoption and Satisfaction Among Patients and Providers Participating in a Multi-Site Survey Study

Author:

Manes Mindi R.1ORCID,Burnfield Judith M.2ORCID,Boersma Kelsey3,Peoples Jason3,Davis Anita4,Beneciuk Jason M.45,Bialosky Joel45,Jordan Katelyn4,Osborne Raine46

Affiliation:

1. Brooks Rehabilitation, Brooks Center for Research Analytics and Outcomes, Jacksonville, FL, USA

2. Madonna Rehabilitation Hospitals, Institute for Rehabilitation Science and Engineering, Lincoln, NE, USA

3. Mary Free Bed Rehabilitation Hospital, Grand Rapids, MI, USA

4. Brooks Rehabilitation, Brooks Clinical Research Center, Jacksonville, FL, USA

5. University of Florida, Department of Physical Therapy, Gainesville, FL, USA

6. University of North Florida, Department of Physical Therapy, Jacksonville, FL, USA

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic compelled rapid healthcare adaptations including increased use of telehealth (TH) and virtual care (VC) to provide rehabilitation services. This multi-site cross-sectional survey study examined rehabilitation patients’ and providers’ experiences with service delivery during the COVID-19 pandemic, including the use of TH/VC. Patients and providers who received or provided rehabilitation services were recruited from 1 of 3 large, post-acute rehabilitation systems located in the Southeastern and Midwestern United States during the COVID-19 pandemic. Participants rated personal satisfaction with rehabilitation services received or rendered during the pandemic and willingness to use TH/VC in the future. Questions also addressed accessibility, ease of use, and perceived barriers to TH/VC use. The adoption and personal satisfaction of TH/VC for rehabilitation care varied between patients and providers. Patients reported higher levels of satisfaction compared to providers ( P < .001). Patients who did not use TH/VC had higher satisfaction than those who did ( P < .05). Patients were less willing than providers to use TH/VC ( P < .001). Those who used TH/VC prior to the pandemic were more willing to use post-pandemic ( P < .001). Patients reported TH/VC was useful in increasing health services accessibility yet were neutral as to the ability of TH/VC to improve outcomes. Patients and providers agreed that TH/VC was easy to learn and use. Medical providers found TH/VC more useful than therapy providers. Participants who used TH/VC during the pandemic are more willing to use the service again in the future. Understanding patient and provider preferences and perspectives is key to the continued use of TH/VC in rehabilitation care.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Health Policy

Reference39 articles.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3