Update on the management of poor ovarian response in IVF: the shift from Bologna criteria to the Poseidon concept

Author:

Drakopoulos Panagiotis1ORCID,Bardhi Erlisa23,Boudry Liese2,Vaiarelli Alberto4,Makrigiannakis Antonis5,Esteves Sandro C.6ORCID,Tournaye Herman2,Blockeel Christophe27

Affiliation:

1. Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090 Brussels, Belgium. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical School, University of Crete, Heraklion, Greece

2. Center for Reproductive Medicine, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium

3. Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, “Sapienza” University of Rome, Roma, Italy

4. G.EN.E.R.A., Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Clinica Valle Giulia, Rome, Italy

5. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical School, University of Crete, Heraklion, Greece

6. ANDROFERT−Andrology and Human Reproduction Clinic, Brazil, São Paulo

7. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia

Abstract

Despite the considerate progress to which assisted reproduction technology (ART) has been subject since 1978, some issues remain unresolved. Notably, the clinical management of patients with a poor ovarian response is still a challenge in everyday practice, frustrating to both the patient and the fertility expert. Poor ovarian responders (PORs) embody 9–24% of patients undergoing ovarian stimulation, meaning that up to one in four patients conceals a poor reproductive prognosis. The last decade has witnessed the attempts of the medical community to standardize diagnosis of POR with the developing of the Bologna Criteria and the subsequent evolution of the low prognosis patient elaborated in the POSEIDON classification. The aim of this article is to summarize all evidence concerning etiology and management of poor ovarian response, including the most recent advances and future prospects in this regard.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3