Comparison of large eddy simulation and Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes evaluations with experimental tests on U-bend duct geometry

Author:

Alessi Giacomo12ORCID,Verstraete Tom1,Koloszar Lilla1,van Beeck Jeronimus Petrus Antonius Johannes1

Affiliation:

1. von Karman Institute for Fluid Dynamics, Sint-Genesius-Rode, Belgium

2. Civil Engineering Department, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

Abstract

The correct prediction of the flow field is of crucial importance to drive numerical optimization to a real improvement of a design. For this purpose, different numerical approaches can be used to study the fluid dynamics characteristics and the performance of the design. In particular, in the present work the Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes and large eddy simulation approach are compared for an internal aerodynamic application. The obtained solutions are validated against experiments through a quantitative and qualitative comparison, i.e. pressure measurements and particle image velocimetry flow visualizations, respectively.

Funder

Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Mechanical Engineering,Energy Engineering and Power Technology

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3