Comparison of optical aberrations in keratoconus with scleral versus rigid gas permeable lenses

Author:

Knoeri Juliette1ORCID,Mhenni Rania1,Friquet Chloé1,Hage Alexandre1,Cuyaubère Roxane1ORCID,Borderie Marie1,Leveziel Loïc1,Bouheraoua Nacim1,Borderie Vincent1

Affiliation:

1. Sorbonne Université, GRC n°32, Transplantation et Thérapies Innovantes de la Cornée, AP-HP, Centre Hospitalier National d’Ophtalmologie des Quinze-Vingts, 28 rue de Charenton, F-75012, Paris, France

Abstract

Purpose to assess optical aberrations under scleral (SL) versus rigid gas permeable (RGP) lenses in patients with keratoconus. Methods A prospective study including 25 eyes of 14 patients. The best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) with corrective glasses, RGP and SL, stage of keratoconus (Amsler-Krumeich classification), minimum pachymetry, maximum keratometry, and corneal higher-order aberrations (i.e, total HOAs, coma, and trefoil) with RGP and with SL were collected. Aberrometry was performed using iTrace® aberrometer (Tracey Technologies, USA). Results 80% of the included keratoconus patients were stage 4, with a mean age of 34.3 years (±8.8). There were no significant differences in mean BCVA (logMAR) between SL and RGP. The mean BCVAs were significantly better both with SL (p < 0.0001) and RGP (p < 0.0001) compared with corrective glasses. Total HOAs (p = 0.01), coma (p = 0.003) and trefoil (p = 0.008) were significantly lower with SL compared with RGP. The BCVA decreased with the stage of keratoconus in SL (p = 0.01) and RGP (p = 0.02). The BCVA decreased with decreasing minimum pachymetry in SL (p = 0.02) and RGP (p = 0.002), and with increasing maximum keratometry in SL (p = 0.02) and RGP (p = 0.01). Significant correlations were found between BCVA, total HOAs (p = 0.008), and coma (p = 0.02) in SL. Conclusion For the same keratoconus patients, total higher order, coma and trefoil optical aberrations were reduced with scleral lenses compared to rigid gas permeable lenses.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Ophthalmology,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3