Rethinking use-restricted open-source licenses for regulating abuse of generative models

Author:

Cui Jonathan1ORCID,Araujo David A2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Penn State University, University Park, PA, USA

2. Penn State University, Harrisburg, PA, USA

Abstract

The rapid progress of Artificial intelligence in generative modeling is marred by widespread misuse. In response, researchers turn to use-based restrictions—contractual terms prohibiting certain uses—as a “solution” for abuse. While these restrictions can be beneficial to artificial intelligence governance in API-gated settings, their failings are especially significant in open-source models: not only do they lack any means of enforcement, but they also perpetuate the current proliferation of tokenistic efforts toward ethical artificial intelligence. This observation echoes growing literature that points to useless efforts in “AI ethics,” and underscores the need to shift from this paradigm. This article provides an overview of these drawbacks and argues that researchers should divert their efforts to studying deployable, effective, and theoretically grounded solutions like watermarking and model alignment from human feedback to effect tangible changes in the current climate of artificial intelligence.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Library and Information Sciences,Information Systems and Management,Computer Science Applications,Communication,Information Systems

Reference43 articles.

1. Bai Y, Jones A, Ndousse K, et al. (2022) Training a helpful and harmless assistant with reinforcement learning from human feedback. arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.05862.

2. GPT-NeoX-20B: An Open-Source Autoregressive Language Model

3. Chen M, Tworek J, Jun H, et al. (2021) Evaluating large language models trained on code. arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.03374.

4. Clark K, Luong MT, Le QV, et al. (2020) ELECTRA: Pre-training text encoders as discriminators rather than generators. arXiv preprint arXiv:2003.10555.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3