Affiliation:
1. University of Exeter, Devon, United Kingdom
Abstract
The mundane, concrete practices of social life have remained underanalyzed, unproblematized, even taken for granted by some social theorists, despite their being constitutive of the very foundation of social life. Despite a growing corpus of ethnographic studies within the sociology of sport, little analytic attention has been devoted to the concrete practices of actually “doing” sporting activity. Based on data derived from a collaborative auto-ethnographic study of distance runners, this article analyzes the ways in which two runners jointly accomplish running-together. The article also examines and “marks” some of the knowledge in action that underpins the production of running-together, analyzed in relation to three specific areas: ground and performance, safety concerns, and “the other,” in the form of training partner(s), highlighting the importance of aural and visual components. It concludes with a call for more detailed analytic descriptions of sporting practices to better ground more abstract generalizations about sporting phenomena.
Subject
Urban Studies,Sociology and Political Science,Anthropology,Language and Linguistics
Reference70 articles.
1. Emotions, Interaction and the Injured Sporting Body
2. ———. 2005. Autoethnography: Self-indulgence or rigorous methodology? In Philosophy and the sciences of exercise, health and sport: Critical perspectives on research methods, edited by M. McNamee, 187—202. London: Routledge .
3. Analytic Autoethnography
Cited by
87 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献