Implicit-Bias Remedies: Treating Discriminatory Bias as a Public-Health Problem

Author:

Greenwald Anthony G.1,Dasgupta Nilanjana2,Dovidio John F.3,Kang Jerry4,Moss-Racusin Corinne A.5,Teachman Bethany A.6

Affiliation:

1. Department of Psychology, University of Washington

2. Department of Psychology, University of Massachusetts

3. Department of Psychology, Yale University

4. School of Law, University of California, Los Angeles

5. Department of Psychology, Skidmore College

6. Department of Psychology, University of Virginia

Abstract

Accumulated findings from studies in which implicit-bias measures correlate with discriminatory judgment and behavior have led many social scientists to conclude that implicit biases play a causal role in racial and other discrimination. In turn, that belief has promoted and sustained two lines of work to develop remedies: (a) individual treatment interventions expected to weaken or eradicate implicit biases and (b) group-administered training programs to overcome biases generally, including implicit biases. Our review of research on these two types of sought remedies finds that they lack established methods that durably diminish implicit biases and have not reproducibly reduced discriminatory consequences of implicit (or other) biases. That disappointing conclusion prompted our turn to strategies based on methods that have been successful in the domain of public health. Preventive measures are designed to disable the path from implicit biases to discriminatory outcomes. Disparity-finding methods aim to discover disparities that sometimes have obvious fixes, or that at least suggest where responsibility should reside for developing a fix. Disparity-finding methods have the advantage of being useful in remediation not only for implicit biases but also systemic biases. For both of these categories of bias, causes of discriminatory outcomes are understood as residing in large part outside the conscious awareness of individual actors. We conclude with recommendations to guide organizations that wish to deal with biases for which they have not yet found solutions.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

General Psychology

Reference127 articles.

1. Adler A. D., Strunk D. R., Fazio R. H. (2015). What changes in cognitive therapy for depression? An examination of cognitive therapy skills and maladaptive beliefs. Behavior Therapy, 46(1), 96–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2014.09.001

2. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (2020). 2019 National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report (Publication No. 20(21)-0045-EF). U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. https://www.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/research/findings/nhqrdr/2019qdr-final-es-cs061721.pdf

3. American Public Health Association. (n.d.). Racism and health. Retrieved January 4, 2022, from https://www.apha.org/Topics-and-Issues/Health-Equity/Racism-and-health

4. American Public Health Association. (2018, November 3). Achieving health equity in the United States (APHA Policy No. 20189). https://www.apha.org/policies-and-advocacy/public-health-policy-statements/policy-database/2019/01/29/achieving-health-equity

5. Asendorpf J. B., Banse R., Mücke D. (2002). Double dissociation between implicit and explicit personality self-concept: The case of shy behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 380–393. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.83.2.380

Cited by 36 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3