A comparative study of using free radical generators in the testing of chosen oxidative stress parameters in the different types of cells

Author:

Miranowicz-Dzierżawska Katarzyna1

Affiliation:

1. Laboratory of Toxicology, Department of Chemical, Aerosol and Biological Hazards, Central Institute for Labour Protection-National Research Institute, Warsaw, Poland

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess whether there are differences between the results of determining oxidative stress markers obtained from different origin cell lines after exposure to chemicals generating free radicals. The studies considered two markers of oxidative stress: the level of thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) and superoxide dismutase activity. The evaluation was performed in five cell lines: Chinese hamster ovary (CHO-9) cells, lung adenocarcinoma A549, macrophages RAW264.7, skin carcinoma cells A431, and keratinocytes HaCaT. Three compounds generating free radicals were used as a source of reactive oxygen/nitrogen: 2,2′-azobis-2-methyl-propanimidamide dihydrochloride (AAPH), sodium persulfate (SP), and 3-morpholinosydnonimine hydrochloride (SIN-1). The most appropriate cell line to assess the level of TBARS proved to be the murine macrophage cell line RAW 264.7. Equally, good performance was observed in the lung cancer cell line A549, but only when tested with AAPH and SP. In the case of measuring superoxide dismutase activity, it appeared that the most suitable cell line was also the RAW 264.7 line, although dispersion increased significantly at the highest concentrations of AAPH and SP measurements. When choosing a cell line to determine oxidative stress, the specificity of the stress-inducing compound and the parameter determined should be taken into consideration.

Funder

Central Institute for Labour Protection - National Research Institute supported by the Ministry of Labour and Social Policy

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Toxicology

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3