The Relative Difficulty Ratio—a Test and Item Index-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

The Relative Difficulty Ratio—a Test and Item Index

Published:1981-07 Issue:2 Volume:41 Page:333-339
ISSN:0013-1644
Container-title:Educational and Psychological Measurement
language:en
Short-container-title:Educational and Psychological Measurement

Author:

Frisbie David A.¹

Affiliation:

1. Measurement and Research Division Office of Instructional Resources University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Abstract

The Relative Difficulty Ratio (RDR) was developed as an index of test or item difficulty for use in situations in which raw score means or item p-values are not directly comparable because of chance score differences. Computational RDR are described. Data from the literature are used to illustrate applications of the RDR at both the test and item level.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Applied Mathematics,Applied Psychology,Developmental and Educational Psychology,Education

Link

http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/001316448104100210

Reference4 articles.

1. MULTIPLE CHOICE VERSUS TRUE-FALSE: A COMPARISON OF RELIABILITIES AND CONCURRENT VALIDITIES

2. The Effect of Item Format on Reliability and Validity: a Study of Multiple Choice and True-False Achievement Tests

3. TEST PERFORMANCE UNDER THE CONDITION OF KNOWN ITEM DIFFICULTY

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. The Multiple True-False Item Format: A Status Review;Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice;2005-10-25

2. Item Type and Cognitive Ability Measured: The Validity Evidence for Multiple True-False Items in Medical Specialty Certification;Applied Measurement in Education;1995-04

3. The Effectiveness of Several Multiple-Choice Formats;Applied Measurement in Education;1992-01

4. An Analysis of Textbook Advice About True-False Tests;Applied Measurement in Education;1991-01