Affiliation:
1. Birkbeck, University of London, London, UK
Abstract
Questions of speech, silencing and injustice have long been central to feminist understandings of sexual violence, and to activism around it. Listening, and its relationship to justice, in contrast, remains under-explored by feminist scholars and activists. In this article, I argue for a feminist politics of listening as an essential precondition for justice around sexual violence. I argue that feminist engagements with listening have tended to be limited to questions of belief but that this is inadequate for a just practice of listening. Instead, I call for the development of a feminist listening public that engages in active practices of both attentive listening in for the details and nuances of survivor speech and listening out to unheard and marginalised voices. It is only within the context of collective political labour around listening, I suggest, that we can begin to develop a just politics around sexual violence.
Reference43 articles.
1. ackhurst m (2023). Investigating the impasse: exploring what is wanted after sexual violence and the things that get in the way. PhD Thesis, Birkbeck College, UK.
2. Beyond Women’s Voices: Towards a Victim-Survivor-Centred Theory of Listening in Law Reform on Violence Against Women
3. Survivor Discourse: Transgression or Recuperation?
4. Arthur CC, Kalulé P, Kanngeiser A (2021) Abolitionary listening: propositions & questions. In: Critical legal thinking. Available at: https://criticallegalthinking.com/2021/09/22/abolitionary-listening-propositions-questions/ September 22 (accessed 18 May 2023).