Proximal Supination Osteotomy for Hallux Valgus: Comparison of Clinical and Radiologic Outcomes for the Most Severe Deformities

Abstract

Background: There is little available information regarding the difference in outcomes between severe hallux valgus (S-HV), defined as 40 degrees ≤ hallux valgus angle (HVA) < 50 degrees, and what we consider to be “super-severe HV” (SS-HV), defined as >50 degrees, following a proximal metatarsal osteotomy. We aimed to retrospectively compare the outcomes of a proximal metatarsal osteotomy in S- and SS-HV. Methods: The series consisted of 57 female patients (57 feet) treated with a proximal supination osteotomy for symptomatic S- and SS-HV (33 and 24 feet, respectively). The outcome measures included radiographic parameters and for 45 patients included the Self-Administered Foot Evaluation Questionnaire (SAFE-Q) score, and a visual analog scale pain score (VAS-PS) preoperatively and at a minimum follow-up of 12 months with a median of 26 months. No significant differences were found in age, body mass index, and the duration of follow-up between patients with S-HV and SS-HV ( P > .10 for all comparisons) with the numbers available. Results: Preoperative HVA in patients with S- and SS-HV was significantly improved at the final follow-up ( P < .0001 for both comparisons). No significant differences in postoperative HVA and IMA were observed between patients with S- and SS-HV (P = .51 and .50, respectively). All 5 preoperative subscale scores of SAFE-Q in patients with S- and SS-HV significantly improved postoperatively ( P < .01 for all comparisons). Preoperative VAS-PS in patients with S- and SS-HV significantly improved postoperatively ( P < .0001 and <.009, respectively). There were no significant differences in preoperative and postoperative scores of all the SAFE-Q subscales and VAS-PS between patients with S-HV and SS-HV ( P > .10 for all) with the numbers available. Conclusion: We found for this patient group that a proximal supination osteotomy can achieve a large correction for SS-HV as well as S-HV and significantly improve radiologic and clinical outcomes in SS-HV. The outcomes between patients with S- and SS-HV were not different in this series. Level of evidence: Level III, retrospective comparative study.