Russia’s strategic communication during the Ukraine crisis (2013–2014): Victims, hypocrites, and radicals
-
Published:2023-05-26
Issue:6
Volume:17
Page:784-810
-
ISSN:1750-4813
-
Container-title:Discourse & Communication
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Discourse & Communication
Affiliation:
1. Communication University of China, China
Abstract
The article retrospectively looks at Russia’s strategic communication during the Ukraine crisis (2013–2014) in light of the ongoing Russian-Ukraine conflicts. Russia’s strategic communication campaign, especially the sophisticated use of state-sponsored international broadcaster-Russia Today (RT)-has been proven to raise sympathy, distract attention and delay effective reactions from the Ukranian government and NATO. RT’s strategic mediatisation of the Ukraine crisis not only fermented a favourable environment for Russia’s annexation of Crimea but set up the meta-narratives and operational framework for the subsequent influence operation practiced by the Russian government during the current Russo-Ukraine war. The article adopts a multimodal discourse analysis to elicit RT’s identity narratives about three main actors during the Ukraine crisis: Russia, the West, and Ukraine. By analysing RT’s YouTube audio-visual representation of the Ukraine crisis, the research finds that RT has applied a victimisation strategy to legitimise Russia’s military intervention in the Annexation of Crimea as a defencive counterattack. The West is accused of provoking a divide between Russia and Ukraine and being an unreliable partner and hypocritical norm-upholder. The Ukrainian components are dichotomously represented. While the pro-Eu protestors and the interim government are framed in line with violence, disorder, and neo-Nazism, the ejected pro-Russian Yanukovych government is legitimised as a democratically elected government, and its policy is aggressively crushed by the pro-Eu protestors. The empirical research suggests that RT’s discursive construction of the Ukraine crisis is built on a divisive script between a victimised pro-Russia club and an aggressive pro-EU camp. By reflecting upon RT’s strategic mediatisation of the Ukraine crisis, the paper seeks to illuminate the historical continuance and variation of Russia’s strategic communication in the post-cold war era. It thus aims to make a meaningful addition to the study of Russian propaganda and shed historical insights to make sense of Russia’s ever-intensifying information campaign during the ongoing Russo-Ukraine War.
Funder
Asia Media Research Center, Communication University of China
China Postdoctoral Science Foundation
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Subject
Linguistics and Language,Communication
Reference120 articles.
1. Beyond Propaganda: Soviet Active Measures in Putin’s Russia
2. Aleksejeva N (2023) Narrative warfare: How the Kremlin and Russian news outlets justified a war of aggression against Ukraine, Atlantic Council. Available at: https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/in-depth-research-reports/report/narrative-warfare/ (accessed 29 September 2020).
3. Researching YouTube
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. RT (Russia Today): From Soft Power to the Weaponization of Information;The Palgrave Handbook of Non-State Actors in East-West Relations;2024
2. RT (Russia Today);The Palgrave Handbook of Non-State Actors in East-West Relations;2024