Comparison of Postoperative Outcome and Prognosis Among Laparoscopic Left Colectomy and Laparoscopic Sigmoidectomy in Sigmoid Colon Cancer Patients: A Propensity Score Matching Study

Author:

Tao Wei12,Liu Fei1,Cheng Yu-Xi13,Zhang Bin1,Liu Xiao-Yu1,Zhang Wei1,Peng Dong1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China

2. Department of General Surgery, Xinqiao Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China

3. Department of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of laparoscopic left colectomy (LLC) and laparoscopic sigmoidectomy (LSD) on short-term outcomes and prognosis of sigmoid colon cancer (SCC) patients using propensity score matching (PSM). Methods In this retrospective study, the SCC patients who underwent LLC or LSD surgery were collected from a single clinical center from Jan 2011 to Dec 2019. Short-term outcomes and prognosis were compared between patients who received LSD surgery and LLC surgery. Results A total of 356 patients were included in this study. After 1:1 PSM analysis, there were 50 patients who underwent LLC surgery and 50 patients who underwent LSD surgery left in this study. No significant difference was found in baseline characteristics after PSM ( P > .05). In comparison with the LLC surgery group, the LSD surgery group had shorter operation time ( P = .003) after PSM. Moreover, the surgical procedure was not an independent predictor for overall survival (OS) ( P = .918, 95% CI = .333–2.688) and disease-free survival DFS ( P = .730, 95% CI = .335–2.150), but age (OS: P = .009, 95% CI = 1.010–1.075; DFS: P = .014, 95% CI = 1.007–1.061) and tumor stage (OS: P = .004, 95% CI = 1.302–3.844; DFS: P < .01, 95% CI = 1.572–4.171) were the independent risk factors for OS and DFS in SCC patients. Conclusion There was no significant difference between the two surgical procedures for prognosis of SCC patients. However, the possible reasons for changing the surgical procedures should be cautious by surgeons.

Funder

CQMU Program for Youth Innovation in Future Medicine

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Oncology,Hematology,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3