Knowledge About Hospice

Author:

Cagle John G.1,Van Dussen Daniel J.2,Culler Krystal L.3,Carrion Iraida4,Hong Seokho1,Guralnik Jack5,Zimmerman Sheryl67

Affiliation:

1. School of Social Work, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, USA

2. Department of Gerontology, Youngstown State University, Youngstown, OH, USA

3. College of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ, USA

4. School of Social Work, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA

5. Division of Gerontology, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA

6. School of Social Work, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA

7. Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA

Abstract

Context: Poor knowledge and misperceptions about hospice are believed to be common, but there is scant evidence about the public’s understanding of hospice. Objectives: To examine hospice knowledge among geographically diverse adults; and describe linkages between knowledge, attitudes and beliefs about hospice care, and demographics. Methods: A small cross-sectional telephone survey of adults living in the contiguous US was conducted using randomly selected numbers (cell phone and landline) and over-sampling of minorities. Measures assessed knowledge (23-item test), attitudes (8-item scale), experiences and preferences related to hospice. Results: 123 participants completed surveys (response rate 46%). 106 (86%) had heard about hospice, 65 (54%) of whom had a personal experience with hospice. Participants had an average hospice knowledge test score of 18 (SD = 3.4) indicating moderate knowledge of hospice. A majority of respondents (62%) did not know that hospice cannot provide concurrent cure-oriented care. Misperceptions about eligibility, coverage of hospice, the provision of hospice in nursing homes or to persons who live alone were not uncommon (missed by >20%). Greater knowledge of hospice was associated with more favorable attitudes about the hospice philosophy of care (r = .22, p = .023) and a greater preference for hospice (p = .049). Respondents who were more educated, worked in the medical field, were non-Hispanic White, and had direct experience with hospice were also more likely to be more knowledgeable about hospice. Conclusion: Despite relatively high hospice awareness and favorability, myths and misperceptions about hospice still abound – and may drive ethnic disparities in end-of-life care. Educational interventions and future study are needed.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

General Medicine

Reference27 articles.

Cited by 87 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3