A Systematic Review of the Risks of Motor Vehicle Crashes Associated with Psychiatric Disorders

Author:

Rapoport Mark J.12,Chee Justin Nathaniel3,Prabha Thadshagini3ORCID,Dow Jamie4,Gillespie Ian5ORCID,Koppel Sjaan6,Charlton Judith L.6,O’Neill Desmond7,Donaghy Paul C.8,Ho Angela Onkay2ORCID,Taylor John-Paul8,Tant Mark9

Affiliation:

1. Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada

2. Faculty of Medicine – Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

3. Ontario Ministry of Transportation, Toronto ON, Canada

4. Société de l’assurance automobile du Québec, Gatineau, QC, Canada

5. Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada

6. Monash University Accident Research Centre, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia

7. National Office for Traffic Medicine, Dublin, Ireland

8. Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK

9. CARA, Vias Institute, Brussels, Belgium

Abstract

Objective Psychiatric disorders and their treatments have the potential to adversely impact driving skills. However, it is unclear to what extent this poses a public health risk by increasing the risk of motor vehicle crashes (MVCs). The aim of this systematic review was to synthesize and critically appraise evidence on the risk of MVC for drivers with psychiatric disorders. Method We conducted a systematic review of the MVC risk associated with psychiatric disorders using seven databases in November 2019. Two reviewers examined each study and extracted data. The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Quality Assessment tools were used to assess each study’s quality of evidence. Results We identified 24 studies that met the inclusion criteria, including eight cohort, 10 case-control, and six cross-sectional designs. Quality assessment ratings were “Good” for four studies, “Fair” for 10, and “Poor” for 10. Self-report or questionnaires were used in place of objective measures of either MVC, psychiatric disorder, or both in 12 studies, and only seven adjusted for driving exposure. Fifteen studies reported an increased risk of MVC associated with psychiatric disorders, and nine did not. There was no category of disorder that was consistently associated with increased MVC risk. Conclusion The available evidence is mixed, not of high quality, and does not support a blanket restriction on drivers with psychiatric disorder. An individualized approach, as recommended by international guidelines, should continue. Further research should include objective assessments of psychiatric disorders and MVC risk and adjust for driving exposure.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health

Reference76 articles.

1. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

2. Lifetime Prevalence and Age-of-Onset Distributions of DSM-IV Disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication

3. The European Study of the Epidemiology of Mental Disorders (ESEMeD) project: an epidemiological basis for informing mental health policies in Europe

4. Mental Health Commission of Canada. Making the case for investing in mental health in Canada. 2016. https://www.mentalhealthcommission.ca/sites/default/files/2016-06/Investing_in_Mental_Health_FINAL_Version_ENG.pdf [accessed 2022 Sept 20].

5. McManus S, Bebbington P, Jenkins R, Brugha T. (eds.) (2016) Mental health and wellbeing in England: Adult Psychiatric Morbidity Survey 2014. Leeds: NHS Digital. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/556596/apms-2014-full-rpt.pdf

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3