A new opportunity for enhancing trial efficiency: Can we investigate intervention implementation processes within trials using SWAT (study within a trial) methodology?

Author:

Ahmed Sadia1ORCID,Airlie Jennifer2ORCID,Clegg Andrew23,Copsey Bethan1,Cundill Bonnie1,Forster Anne23,Heaven Anne2,Johansson Jessica F2,Kime Nicola2,Moreau Lauren1,Ozer Seline2,Parker Catriona1,Richards Suzanne H4,Thompson Ellen1,Farrin Amanda J1

Affiliation:

1. Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK

2. Academic Unit for Ageing and Stroke Research, Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford, UK

3. Academic Unit for Ageing and Stroke Research, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK

4. Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, West Yorkshire, UK

Abstract

Background A study within a trial (SWAT) is a self-contained research study embedded within one or more host trials to evaluate or explore alternative ways of delivering or organising a particular trial process. There is limited evidence of SWATs evaluating trial processes other than recruitment and retention. Purpose Embedding a SWAT into a host trial provides a potential method of evaluating an aspect of intervention implementation, such as engagement or compliance with the intervention. Research Design This paper presents two case studies of SWATs which aim to test the use of video animations to improve intervention implementation, with particular focus on enhancing understanding, engagement and compliance. These are important aspects of intervention implementation as they are directly linked to intervention effectiveness and therefore, important to study. Results In this paper, we present the potential benefits of conducting SWATs of intervention implementation processes as well as discussing the methodological considerations for embedding a SWAT of this nature within a host trial. Benefits include the opportunity to test minor refinements to intervention implementation within trials through robust randomised SWATs, and the possibility of increasing trial efficiency by maximising the quality or quantity of intervention implementation. Methodological considerations surrounding the design and conduct of the SWAT as well as statistical and health economics considerations are discussed in this paper. Conclusions This paper presents a novel application of SWAT methodology in investigating intervention implementation processes within trial conduct.

Funder

MRC-NIHR Trials Methodology Research Partnership PhD cohort

National Institute for Health Research

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Reference19 articles.

1. Trial Forge Guidance 1: what is a Study Within A Trial (SWAT)?

2. Cockayne S, Torgerson D, Fairhurst C. Improving participant retention using a pen as an incentive with the reminder for a postal follow-up questionnaire [Internet] Northern Ireland Network for Trials Methodology Research - SWAT Repository Store; 2020. https://www.qub.ac.uk/sites/TheNorthernIrelandNetworkforTrialsMethodologyResearch/FileStore/Filetoupload,1098871,en.pdf.

3. Carr R. Impact on recruitment of using an invitation letter informed by self-determination theory [Internet]: Northern Ireland Network for Trials Methodology Research - SWAT Repository Store; 2020. https://www.qub.ac.uk/sites/TheNorthernIrelandNetworkforTrialsMethodologyResearch/FileStore/Filetoupload,1098869,en.pdf.

4. Morrissey B, Casey B, Power R. Branded gift and letter from PPI group to enhance questionnaire response rate in a randomised trial [Internet]: Northern Ireland Network for Trials Methodology Research - SWAT Repository Store; 2020. https://www.qub.ac.uk/sites/TheNorthernIrelandNetworkforTrialsMethodologyResearch/FileStore/Filetoupload,998532,en.pdf.

5. Hood K, Robling M, Kirby N, et al. Modes of data collection for subjective outcomes at follow-up: comparing a choice and a failure-based approach [Internet]: Northern Ireland Network for Trials Methodology Research - SWAT Repository Store; 2020. https://www.qub.ac.uk/sites/TheNorthernIrelandNetworkforTrialsMethodologyResearch/FileStore/Filetoupload,1072375,en.pdf.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3