Reflections on co-creating a model for the value assessment of artificial intelligence technologies

Author:

Karlsson Anne Wettergren12ORCID,Janssens Astrid234,Barkler Astrid5,Schmidt Thomas67,Rasmussen Benjamin Schnack Brandt8ORCID,Fasterholdt Iben79ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark

2. Centre for Research with Patients and Relatives (ForSa-P), Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark

3. Bioethics and Health Humanities, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands

4. Department of Public Health, User Perspective and Community-based Interventions, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark

5. Patient and Relative, CIMT – Center for Innovative Medical Technology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark

6. Center for Health Informatics and Technology, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark

7. CIMT – Center for Innovative Medical Technology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark

8. Department of Radiology and CAI-X – Centre for Clinical Artificial Intelligence, Odense University Hospital Denmark, Odense, Denmark

9. Program for Health System and Technology Evaluation, Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada

Abstract

Aims: A multidisciplinary group of experts and patients developed the Model for ASsessing the value of Artificial Intelligence (MAS-AI) to ensure an evidence-based and patient-centered approach to introducing artificial intelligence technologies in healthcare. In this article, we share our experiences with meaningfully involving a patient in co-creating a research project concerning complex and technically advanced topics. Methods: The co-creation was evaluated by means of initial reflections from the research team before the project started, in a continuous logbook, and through semi-structured interviews with patients and two researchers before and after the active co-creation phase of the project. Results: There were initial doubts about the feasibility of including patients in this type of project. Co-creation ensured relevance to patients, a holistic research approach and the debate of ethical considerations. Due to one patient dropping out, it is important to foresee and support the experienced challenges of time and energy spent by the patient in future projects. Having a multidisciplinary team helped the collaboration. A mutual reflective evaluation provided insights into the process which we would otherwise have missed. Conclusions: We found it possible to create complex and data-intense research projects with patients. Including patients benefitted the project and gave researchers new perspectives on their own research. Mutual reflection throughout the project is key to maximise learning for all parties involved.

Funder

Odense University Hospital Innovation Grant

Publisher

SAGE Publications

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3