Evaluating Consistency in Reporting of Gender Dysphoria Before and After Facial Feminization Surgery: A Systematic Review

Author:

Yanoshak Emily1ORCID,Wu Arthur1,Kumar Abhishek1ORCID,Goldman Jennifer1,Wehelie Hibo1,Black Jonathan1

Affiliation:

1. University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA

Abstract

Background: Facial Feminization Surgery (FFS) plays a significant role in gender-affirming care for transgender women. However, gender dysphoria (GD) levels after FFS are poorly quantified. In this systematic review, we evaluated the impact of FFS on GD. Methods : Search terms including “facial feminization surgery,” “FFS,” “Gender dysphoria,” and related key words were used to identify articles in PubMed and Scopus. Two independent evaluators reviewed studies, with conflicts resolved by a third evaluator. Included studies discussed adult transgender female patients or patients with GD undergoing FFS on their cranium, examining outcomes such as GD, patient satisfaction, or quality of life (QOL). Exclusion criteria included studies on pediatric patients, cadavers, or soft tissue-only FFS. Data discussing FFS procedures performed, subjective and objective analyses of postoperative outcomes, and parameters examining GD, patient satisfaction, and QOL were extracted and analyzed using descriptive statistics. Results : Of 660 studies identified, 18 met inclusion criteria. A total of 1301 patients underwent FFS, with the most performed FFS procedures being facial bone contouring (15 cases) and rhinoplasty (14 cases). Seventeen studies used postoperative surveys to evaluate FFS outcomes. Subjective parameters evaluated included direct assessment of GD (2 studies), indirect assessment of GD (9 studies), psychosocial well-being (11 studies), QOL (11 studies), and patient satisfaction (13 studies). Objective measures assessed included physical examinations (6 studies), independent raters (4 studies), patient photographs (9 studies), cephalometric measurements (5 studies), and medical imaging (5 studies). Sixteen articles reported patients were satisfied with FFS, while improved psychosocial well-being and QOL were both noted in 10 studies. Improvement of GD due to FFS was noted in 3 studies. Conclusion : Postoperative GD is not frequently evaluated in patients undergoing FFS. As gender-affirming surgery is central to treating GD, it is essential to develop validated and standardized measures to assess the efficacy of FFS.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Reference28 articles.

1. Garg G Elshimy G Marwaha R. Gender dysphoria. [Updated 2023 July 11]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK532313/

2. Standards of Care for the Health of Transsexual, Transgender, and Gender-Nonconforming People, Version 7

3. The Amsterdam Cohort of Gender Dysphoria Study (1972–2015): Trends in Prevalence, Treatment, and Regrets

4. The phenomenology of gender dysphoria in adults: A systematic review and meta-synthesis

5. Gender dysphoria;Atkinson SR;Aust Fam Physician,2015

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.7亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2025 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3