Barriers for the Inclusion of Clinicians Living with Disabilities in Healthcare Professions: The Peers’ Perspectives

Author:

Jarus Tal1ORCID,Holmes Cheryl2ORCID,Yee Adrian3ORCID,Ghag Cheyenne1,Varady Heather1,Parhar Gurdeep4ORCID,Choi Jisung1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada

2. Divising of Critical Care, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada

3. Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada

4. Department of Family Practice, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada

Abstract

Background Health professionals living with disabilities are valuable to healthcare due to their dual identity as a clinician and a person living with disability yet remain underrepresented in the workforce. While the barriers to inclusion of clinicians living with disabilities from their own perspective are reported, little is known about peers’ perspectives. Objective This study aims to explore the barriers and gaps in knowledge to the inclusion of clinicians living with disabilities from the perspective of colleagues. Methods Health professionals and staff (healthcare workers) in a public health authority in Canada responded to a survey consisting of closed and open questions, under 3 subthemes: attitudes, institutional barriers, and gaps in knowledge. Inferential statistics were performed to assess the overall attitudes and differences in perceptions based on types of disability. Results Attitudes and barriers varied based on type of disability - clinicians living with physical disabilities were perceived most positively compared to those living with cognitive/learning disabilities. Attitudes also varied based on experience with disability - clinicians with lived experience had more positive attitudes. Gaps in knowledge were found to exist on an individual and organizational level. Conclusion The results of this study can open the discussion for rehabilitation and human resource professionals needing to learn about workplace accommodations for health professionals living with disabilities and support addressing attitudes and barriers they face.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.7亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2025 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3